User talk:RightGot/Archive 0

Year 32,768 problem
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Year 32,768 problem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Year 32,768 problem
An editor has nominated Year 32,768 problem, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Fire drills, regulations, and where
Just as a heads-up, I've gone in and made some changes with your merge and split. I've gone in and reassociated the history of List of fire drill regulations with the lion's share of the article, for purposes of consistency. The end result is the same, but the page history is now with List of fire drill regulations in the United States. Just thought I'd let you know... SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:00, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Mandarin Middle School
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. -- Oni Ookami Alfador Talk 19:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed moves
At least two of your recent moves and creating a new article at the original space are disputed (by me). I'm going to request they be moved back. Please do not make any more such moves without consensus. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 20:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I have reverted your edits and moves to Manned mission to Mars and Manned Venus Flyby‎ because they are so drastic and disruptive as to amount to vandalism. "Manned" may not be appropriate in 2008 but back in the '60s it's what these mission were called. Changing the name is misleading and plain wrong. You are clearly not familiar with the material and you have not sought consensus before making major changes. Please do not do this again. andy (talk) 23:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mandarin Middle School
An editor has nominated Mandarin Middle School, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on GHS (high schools), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Nonsense of SHS (high schools)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on SHS (high schools), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because SHS (high schools) provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting SHS (high schools), please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Creating Redirects
Hi. I am asking that you please stop creating redirects to year articles, for example here. Redirects can be used in many ways, like the ones listed here. The chance that somebody will search for "Nineteen oh nine" is very little, thus making these redirects unnecessary. If you have any questions, feel free to visit my talk page. Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of GHS (high schools)
An editor has nominated GHS (high schools), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

I have also nominated the following articles:
 * MHS (high schools)‎
 * WHS (high schools)‎
 * AHS (high schools)‎
 * BHS (high schools)‎
 * CHS (high schools)‎
 * DHS (high schools)‎
 * EHS (high schools)‎
 * FHS (high schools)‎
 * HHS (high schools)‎
 * IHS (high schools)‎
 * LHS (high schools)‎
 * PHS (high schools)
 * RHS (high schools)‎

'''Please stop creating pointless lists and redirect pages. It is disruptive'''. andy (talk) 12:13, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Loretto Elementary School
A tag has been placed on Loretto Elementary School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

NN. Elementary schools are not normally seen as notable per se. There's no evidence for the notability of this particular school.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy (talk) 12:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Crown Point Elementary School
A tag has been placed on Crown Point Elementary School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

NN. Elementary schools are not normally seen as notable per se. There's no evidence for the notability of this particular school.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Crown Point Elementary School
An editor has nominated Crown Point Elementary School, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)