User talk:RightGot/Archive 2

Archive: Archive 0

ANI
See WP:ANI. You're welcome to comment. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AFD
Hello. When creating an AFD, please follow the instructions on Template:AFD near the bottom. Also, please look at WP:AFD for more. Thanks. ♦Ace of Silver♦ 22:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD proposals
Hi,

If you're recently been reprimanded for creating inappropriate articles, going full tilt in the opposite direction and bulk-proposing the deletion of existing page of that type could be seen as a manifestation of WP:POINT. I'd advise you to hold off doing this for a while. Chris Cunningham (talk) 22:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Girlfriend
You nominated Girlfriend for the 7th Afd. What happened?? Georgia guy (talk) 22:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD Nominations
Please hold off on the AFD nominations until you become more familiar with wikipedia, as it is obvious that you are not familiar enough to make judgements regarding deletions. Your recent nominations of articles that you claim belong on Wiktionary do not, and you seem to misunderstand our policy. Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. Sean MD80 talk 23:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I've closed all your AfDs early as there was a clear consensus to keep, and some valid questions and concerns about your motivations and rationale for the nominations. Can I ask that in future instead of creating a mass nomination such as all personal pronouns, or a contentious one such as Girlfriend which has been nominated 7 times, that you test the waters with a single AfD rather than nominating 11 articles in less than half an hour? --Canley (talk) 01:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Persistent disruptive edits
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyjsmith (talk • contribs) 00:45, 20 January 2008

School prank
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article School prank, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Archiving
There is nothing wrong with archiving by moving the page, I do it myself. But moving it to archive 1 then to archive 0 then blanking the redirect makes it look like you have something to hide. I've added a link to the top of this talk page so that other admins can look at your past warnings on your talk page. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 16:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is RightGot. Thank you.  Zappa  O  Mati   16:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

AFD
I notice you haven't been editing much over the last few years, and came back to do an AFD. The AFD was in bad form. We don't delete articles because an event has passed, the hype surrounding the event is what makes the article worth having, not the actual "end of the world!". Looking back at your archives (which took some doing since you spent some effort to hide them) I see that sending stuff to AFD has been a problem for you before. I strongly suggest you just avoid all AFDs. They forgot to notify you, but this is being discussed at ANI now. If you were to keep doing poorly considered AFDs, it would likely end in a block for you, so I suggest reading on policy and just avoiding them all together. If you think an article needs AFD, you might just to go the talk page of AFD and recommend or discuss it there, at AFD. Dennis Brown - 2&cent;    &copy;  Join WER 16:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Or possibly even broach the subject on the Talk Page of the article itself? Martinevans123 (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Book theft from libraries for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Book theft from libraries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Book theft from libraries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Humblesnore (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Fast food restaurant robbery


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Fast food restaurant robbery. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Robbery. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robbery – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ...William 23:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Fast food restaurant robbery


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Fast food restaurant robbery. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Robbery. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Robbery – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ...William 00:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Fast food restaurant robbery. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ''It is obvious you're doing this through an IP. '' ...William 00:10, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MHS (high schools)


A tag has been placed on MHS (high schools) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Delete per Articles for deletion/AHS (high schools) & WP:DABABBREV.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

April 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment&#32;with the page Earth. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. — Gorthian (talk) 04:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, List of oldest living men


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, List of oldest living men. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – List of the verified oldest men. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of the verified oldest men – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions.  J 947  05:13, 31 March 2017 (UTC)