User talk:RightTruthTeller

Welcome!
Hello, RightTruthTeller, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 10:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

What we are not
Please read WP:NOT and wp:advocacy, also do not cast aspersions or attack other uses.Slatersteven (talk) 16:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Also please read wp:m minor edits are not changes in tone or substance.Slatersteven (talk) 16:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Given your user page statement you might also want to read wp:rs and wp:v, we only say what RS explicitly say, not our own understanding of what they say (seewp:or). Any statement should (if challenged) be supported by reliable third party sources. Any claim supported by third party sources can only really be challenged if other RS have challenged it, it does not matter if we know it is not true.Slatersteven (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

It's literally just my user bio what do you mean, why would I need to 'verify' information about myself? RightTruthTeller (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)RightTruthTeller
 * What? I am telling you that if you mean what you say in your user Bio you need to read the applicable polices about things like reliable and adequate sources and what we mean by it. If you do not follow our polices on RS or Verifiaiblty then your mission statement is meaningless. No experienced user is here to tell lies or distort sources.Slatersteven (talk) 18:44, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I would never tell a lie RightTruthTeller (talk) 21:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)RightTruthTeller

Unconstructive editing
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Far-right politics in the United Kingdom. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 19:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Here's a fun fact for you, I never ever tried to 'add commentary' or my own point of view, I simply edited the outdated article to include the up-to-date information. The article claimed that Tommy Robinson was the leader of the EDL, which is of course not true, therefore I changed it to read 'ex-leader'. It almost seems like you are trying to censor truth...?
 * Also, I really do not understand why one is not allowed to edit their own page to their liking. Who better to write my own bio than fucking me. Perhaps you would volunteer to study my life and then maybe write the bio for me? I assume you'd like to tell me all about myself. RightTruthTeller (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2019 (UTC)RightTruthTeller


 * I assume was talking about this edit. You added the bolded part to UKIP was then widely described as moving into far-right territory, a description which is of course untrue, ... without citing a source for it, contradicting the meaning of the first clause, leaving us to believe it is simply your POV. Unless you cite a WP:RS, that's what it looks like.
 * You also edited Batten focused the party more on opposing Islam... to change "Islam" to "Islamic extremism", which again changes the meaning of the sentence, without citing a source, again looking like it's your POV.
 * Continuing, ...and sought closer relations with the far-right activist Tommy Robinson..., where you removed the "far-right" without citing a WP:RS that contradicts the others that say he is.
 * That is why we say you are adding commentary/your own POV/WP:OR – because you haven't cited the sources to defend what you wrote and show that it is not just your opinion.
 * The comments did not apply to what you write in your bio. We are simply reading your bio and taking it at face value, which shows a number of potentially problematic behaviors, like WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:GREATWRONGS. —[ Alan M 1 (talk) ]— 02:44, 16 February 2019 (UTC)


 * exactly. Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Article talk pages are not meant to be used for general comments or complaints about Wikipedia
In a nutshell, they aren't forums. They're for constructive and specific discussions on how to improve that specific article. Doug Weller talk 19:40, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is "RightTruthTeller". Cullen328  Let's discuss it  02:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention my friend RightTruthTeller (talk) 21:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)RightTruthTeller