User talk:RightWingBestWing

May 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Melrose High School (Canberra). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 01:04, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Palmer Report, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Identity Australia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Identity Australia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nazism. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Fraser Anning’s Conservative National Party
Stop with your disruptive editing and reverting of sourced material. Geelongite (talk) 02:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Identity Australia


Hello, RightWingBestWing. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Identity Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Phospheros (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Fraser Anning's Conservative National Party. Doug Weller talk 14:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Unity is Strength (Australia) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unity is Strength (Australia) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Unity is Strength (Australia) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 14:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)