User talk:Rightly

Proposed deletion of Phisycal ontology
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phisycal ontology, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * WP:OR

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Against deletion
Sorry, I am a physicist with interest on phylosophy, and think that for us is always a great problem to express these where our discipline must be joined with phylosophy. Therefore, I (after consulting some my associate in job) judge basic to have such important techical-phylosophical term. Anyhow, I will try to improve it. Thank you! --Rightly (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2008 (UTC)