User talk:Rightok32

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Fgtg Browser


The article Fgtg Browser has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 11:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Fgtg Browser
This article was deleted once again today, for the second time as blatant advertising. I just wanted to let you know that before I nominated it for WP:CSD I actually downloaded the browser .exe file from the home website and ran it through a large collection of scanners and it came up as containing adware. One scanner also identified it as containing a Trojan. From this evidence, plus the fact that the file is only 512 KB, which is far smaller than any browser, leads me to believe the the file was really just malware and that the article was a hoax. Please don't recreate an article on this subject again. - Ahunt (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)