User talk:Rigley

Tibet
Hi Agree with you on all points concerning Tibet. Could you point me in the direction of sources of the PRC contribution to the preservation of Tibetan culture? Also, 'unbiased' sources of China/Tibet history. Many thanks.

Stephen. stephenaustinmail@gmail.com www.stephenraustin.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen A (talk • contribs) 02:11, 19 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Tibet is an independent entity and the dirty simian chinese should be kicked out of there so as to restore Tibet's status as a sovereign and free republic. To this end, India along with Russia and the US, together with all the SE Asian nations should come together and slaughter the chinese to the last monkey.117.194.236.83 (talk) 10:25, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Conquest of Kingdom of Khotan
There should be an article for the Turkic Muslim conquest of the Buddhist Indo-European Kingdom of Khotan- explaining how the Tarim Basin got Turkified. AS of now, its a big gap in the articles on the history of Xinjiang.Rajmaan (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Family planning policy) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Family planning policy, Rigley!

Wikipedia editor Prof tpms just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Social consequences and such sections are needed"

To reply, leave a comment on Prof tpms's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

New requested move
Have you seen this new requested move? --Elnon (talk) 22:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gablescar. Shrike (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Non-encyclopaedic wording not found in source
I changed your wording here because it was a non-encyclopaedic wording not found in source. Geographyinitiative (talk) 13:28, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

"Gender neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gender neutrality in Spanish and Portuguese. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 12 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

"Anti-blackness" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-blackness and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 17 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Republic of China (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Republic of China (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Republic of China (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)