User talk:Rigscapes

January 2021
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --[[User:Fehufanga|
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * Fehufangą ]] ♮ ✉ Talk page  ♮ 00:06, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Rigscapes. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Shlomo Riskin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.   Timmy (talk) 00:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Yehezkel Abramsky. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Nigel757 (talk) 00:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

ARBPIA notice
Despite what the notice says, this case does imply that your contributions so far are unacceptable. You are massively violating the ARBPIA rules. You are wasting your time anyway, as your contributions will soon be reverted and most likely you will soon be blocked. Zerotalk 03:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:16, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Please explain to me why you should not be blocked indefinitely, or at the least topic-banned.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)