User talk:Rigsella

Sockpuppet investigation
—SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 19:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —SerialNumber54129  paranoia / cheap sh*t room 20:32, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Problem with using primary sources and advocating for someone
You seem to have things a little confused and think that it's best to use primary sources and to write an article from the perspective of the subject of the article.

That would work for a website or a blog, not an encyclopedia article, which is supposed to have some distance from the subject and use secondary sources. See Primary and secondary sources. The point is to be objective and not a soapbox or means of advocating for someone.–CaroleHenson (talk) 20:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)