User talk:Rihantkumar

April 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 12:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the correction. I will take care of this. Rihantkumar (talk) 04:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi MrOllie,
 * I am not sure if I added any inappropriate links. I followed your guidelines and added the referent link in the footnote rather than the body. The link is from a credible research organization and the information I added is also available in the public domain. All these are as per your guidelines.
 * Moreover, I found that you already hosted similar information from another research organization on the same page. I just tried to provide the latest and longer-term forecast, which I think would have provided value to the readers. Please find below the sentence I am referring to: “According to Verified Market Research, the agricultural robots market is expected to reach $11.58 billion by 2025.[7]”
 * I find it discriminatory that you only removed the sentence I put and not the above one. If the reference I provided is inappropriate, then you should remove all other similar references from your platform. If not, then please clarify why you think that the external link I put is inappropriate and not the ones put by others in a number of Wikipedia pages. Else, it’s a clear discrimination.
 * I look forward to hearing from you.
 * Regards,
 * Rihant Rihantkumar (talk) 03:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Team,
 * I am not sure if I added any inappropriate links. I followed your guidelines and added the referent link in the footnote rather than the body. The link is from a credible research organization and the information I added is also available in the public domain. All these are as per your guidelines.
 * Moreover, I found that you already hosted similar information from another research organization on the same page. I just tried to provide the latest and longer-term forecast, which I think would have provided value to the readers. Please find below the sentence I am referring to: “According to Verified Market Research, the agricultural robots market is expected to reach $11.58 billion by 2025.[7]”
 * I find it discriminatory that you only removed the sentence I put and not the above one. If the reference I provided is inappropriate, then you should remove all other similar references from your platform. If not, then please clarify why you think that the external link I put is inappropriate and not the ones put by others in a number of Wikipedia pages. Else, it’s a clear discrimination.
 * I look forward to hearing from you.
 * Regards,
 * Rihant Rihantkumar (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I find it discriminatory that you only removed the sentence I put and not the above one. If the reference I provided is inappropriate, then you should remove all other similar references from your platform. If not, then please clarify why you think that the external link I put is inappropriate and not the ones put by others in a number of Wikipedia pages. Else, it’s a clear discrimination.
 * I look forward to hearing from you.
 * Regards,
 * Rihant Rihantkumar (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Regards,
 * Rihant Rihantkumar (talk) 04:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)