User talk:RikuFryderyk1

March 2024
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not: The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
 * a workspace for a draft article
 * a personal website, blog, or social media site
 * a space for self-promotion or other advertising
 * a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography


 * Hi Rsjaffe,
 * The purpose of my article, as I said before, is to have a professional page with information about myself on the internet. I see no reason as to why a notable person should not be able to make their own WikiPedia article. Would it help if I asked someone else to publish the same article for me?
 * I spent hours on this article and do not wish it to be speedily removed from the eight-week waiting list for it to be removed. It does not contain spam, it is not a pointless topic, it does not violate copyright as all photographs and book rights belong to me, and it is not low-quality as well. These are the reasons that I am aware of that determine your page is disposed to the speedy deletion line. RikuFryderyk1 (talk) 04:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RikuFryderyk1


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RikuFryderyk1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 03:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Concerns about your autobiography
Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I have just seen your community post on YouTube about the Wikipedia article for yourself that you are in the process of creating. May I advise you, strongly, that it is not a good idea to publish an article about yourself on Wikipedia, even if it is a professional page. The reason your previous contributions have been deleted is because they contravened Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines, and specifically WP:AB, which states that writing an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. Unfortunately, having published a book or having a well-established YouTube channel does not make content about you eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia (see WP:CREATIVE). Also, the snippet of the article that you have made visible on the YouTube post appears to have quite a promotional tone, which would reduce your chances significantly of the article being kept even if it was published (see WP:NPOV). Basically, this attempt at publishing an article about yourself will be no different from your previous ones. Please also note the warnings other editors have given you - they have been given for a reason. Maybe you could consider contributing to articles about public transport in London instead? Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Redtree21 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * so at what point in life will I finally be "eligible" to have a wikipedia article about myself? RikuFryderyk1 (talk) 08:40, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
 * WP:NAUTHOR is one (but not the only) criterion. If someone thinks there should be an article about you, they will create it. Jay  💬 08:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RikuFryderyk1


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:RikuFryderyk1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay 💬 07:59, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Riku Fryderyk for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riku Fryderyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riku Fryderyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Redtree21 (talk) 03:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * For some strange reason, there was no conclusion to the discussion about this article's deletion, and it has now been completely removed though other people were editing it. RikuFryderyk1 (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The discussion concluded 5 days back with the outcome of Delete. Jay  💬 06:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)