User talk:Rilbiz

WP:Films Welcome
 Welcome! Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for January has been published.  February's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!
 * Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 05:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Spam
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 01:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic are preferred by WikiProject Films because they are aggregators of multiple film reviews, so there isn't any bias in using them. Specifically, Rotten Tomatoes got coverage today, so it's a very prominent and oft-cited website.  Internet Movie Database is also a staple on film articles because it provides detailed cast and crew information that would be too indiscriminate or crowded on Wikipedia.  As for your website, it constitutes a conflict of interest for you to promote it on Wikipedia.  Wikipedia is not a link farm, so reviews should not be added indiscriminately or when someone happens to write a new one.  External links are supposed to be selective in nature, so it's a case of determining, what does your review provide that no one else's does?  For example, if the creators of Transformers reviewed the new film, and there was no room in the article for their perspective, links to their very relevant reviews would be provided in the external links.  In judging your website's prominence, Google only shows 599 hits with the keywords "hollywood snitch" -site:hollywoodsnitch.com (the latter which excludes your own site), with many of the hits not being very prominent in coverage at all -- some being copies of Wikipedia articles where your reviews existed before their removals.  Hence, it's difficult to see how your website is more critical as an external link than any other film review found on the Internet, whether on Rotten Tomatoes or not.  Traffic is not supposed to be generated in Wikipedia for a reviewer's prominence.  It should be independently established as a go-to reviewer, and the search results do not reflect that prominence yet.  I hope you understand that you are not the only small-scale reviewer to have his or her reviews removed from Wikipedia; presenting a different view point is not a valid excuse with Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic making available to all users a multitude of reviews from different perspectives.  I would suggest trying to find your niche at Rotten Tomatoes and see if your website's reputation can improve in time. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

August 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The August 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 13:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call
Hey fellow Wikipedian! Your username is listed on the WikiProject Films participants list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active on the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:FILM editor, please add your name to the Active Members list. You may also wish to add   to your userpage, if you haven't done so already. We also have several task forces that you may be interested in joining as well. Also, elections for Project Coordinators are currently in sign-up phase. If you would be interested in running, or would like to ask questions of the candidates, please take a look. You can see more information on the positions at WikiProject Films/Coordinators. Thanks and happy editing! An automatic notification by BrownBot 01:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2007 Newsletter
The September 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Please note that special delivery options have been reset and ignored for this issue due to the revamp of the membership list (outlined in further detail in the newsletter). If you would like to change your delivery settings for future issues, please follow the above link. I apologize for the inconvenience. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 23:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

External links sections
Hi Rilbiz, I see that you've added many links to hollywoodsnitch.com to film articles, but could you please consider not doing that anymore? I don't think that website really falls within our guideline on acceptable external links. Certain websites are considered acceptable in External links sections in film articles &mdash; you can see a list here. Wikipedia is not a place to promote websites or attract visitors to a site &mdash; that's considered a conflict of interest. I hope you can understand. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!