User talk:Riley0O0O0O

November 2019
Hello, I'm Zinnober9. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wouter Hanegraaff without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Theosophy (Boehmian). This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with the standards for academic journals
All your recent redirects concerned notable journals, with sources that are in line with our journal guide. This is disruptive. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)