User talk:Rileyregular18

Welcome!
Hello, Rileyregular18, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beau Geste hypothesis


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Beau Geste hypothesis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mean as custard (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

You should be using your sandbox to draft your article. Don’t move your work to mainspace until it’s a lot better developed. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Beau Geste hypothesis
Hi there Rileyregular18! As you may have noticed above, another Wikipedian saw that you created Beau Geste hypothesis with only a little placeholder content. Your sandbox is, as you know, a great place to work on articles until they are ready for prime time, so I've moved your placeholder to User:Rileyregular18/sandbox/Beau Geste hypothesis. It can live there as long as you like while you work through your course. Happy editing! ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 16:37, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Beau geste hypothesis
Hello Rileyregular18,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Beau geste hypothesis for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Beau geste hypothesis moved to Draft:Beau geste hypothesis
Hi, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of Lucky chops has been moved to Draft:Lucky chops. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see


 * 1) reliable source - see WP:RS
 * 2) primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
 * 3) verification - see WP:V
 * 4) notability - see WP:N
 * 5) webcite - see  WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, kindly ping me at my talk page or at your talk page by typing (please remove "nowiki" upon replying) for me to review the page. For more editing help, you could send your question to the friendly and helpful volunteers at the Teahouse. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there are some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Aslo, do check out the Welcome message I sent you as there are topic on editing that you would find helpful. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:50, 25 March 2018 (UTC)