User talk:Rimara

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Veronicas has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/theveronicas, http://www.myspace.com/456751007, http://www.myspace.com/449998944).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Solid Tear
A tag has been placed on Solid Tear requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Triwbe (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Kamen Rider Double (character)
The above page is not for discussing the subject of the article. It is for discussing changes to the article. Asking what the motif is is not a question for talk pages.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 01:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * My mistake, but what I really want to say is that other Kamen Riders' motifs are written in the lead of their respective articles. What about Double?--Rimara (talk) 02:33, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * We don't know it.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:38, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Isn't it mentioned in any reliable source like Japanese TV websites? Sorry, I know nothing about this because I don't read Japanese.--Rimara (talk) 02:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:44, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As far as I remember, beside reliable source, the motifs can also be evidenced with research. Is that true? If so, how about research of Double?--Rimara (talk) 02:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Nothing is known.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 06:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)