User talk:Rimonarab15

Speedy deletion of Rimoniscusplatypus
A tag has been placed on Rimoniscusplatypus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 01:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for experimenting with our encyclopedia. The test edit you made worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Tips on starting your first article
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type  here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dloh cierekim  01:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rimoniscusplatypus
A tag has been placed on Rimoniscusplatypus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Recreation of Rimoniscusplatypus
Pardon me for saying so, but this looks like utter bleeding nonsense. You could perhaps offer a link to a reliable source about this? I find nothing. Without sourcing, it is sure to be deleted, and you are sure to be mistaken for a vandal. Contact me here or on my talk page. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  02:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Rimoniscusplatypus
A tag has been placed on Rimoniscusplatypus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I concur with Flying toaster. Bigfoot is encyclopedic based on the verifiable] information found in reliable sources. There are thousands of scholarly works that talk about it. There are thousands of news accounts about it. There are [millions of web pages. Google count does not equate to notability, but there are sufficient reliable sources that talk about it. A search for "Rimoniscusplatypus" finds-- nothing. I've asked for sourcing for this, and you've provided none. The feeling is this something you made up. That is not suitable for an encyclopedia article. [[User:Dlohcierekim|  Dloh ]] cierekim  02:35, 2 October 2008 (UTC)