User talk:Rimstigh

Welcome!
Hello, Rimstigh, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

PEER REVIEW
The first source that you selected was good but there was some information that you wrote in the sandbox that was not on that page and it did not get cited. Something to look further into. Also, the article said that 2011 was a big year for hacktivists but the article only had three events form 2011. Maybe you could add a few other notable ones.

Something else which is not really your fault but something that you could look into is the Sony hack. On the source you have it says that the event happened in 2011 but on the wikipedia page it says that it took place in 2014.

You could possibly leave the Project Chanology portion and then just maybe do a quick description of it. There is already a wikipedia page for it so maybe just use a source from that page and just describe it in a few sentences.

Your second section of changes under the forms and methods was good but your citation would not allow me to open it up. Might be something on my end or something that I have to manually type in but might be something to look at. Probably not a huge concern though.

For your Academic Interpretations section I think you could expand more on that entire section. You have very good information but maybe just try to explain more and talk about maybe how big of a threat that hacktivism is and what we have already done to try to conquer it. Explain what you mean by academic interpretations because when I was reading it I got kind of confused as to what it is exactly. I think by expanding on those source then you should be good for that though because it will explain it.

Overall very good ideas on an interesting topic. You have good ideas and good thoughts but just expand on them on some parts. I also think you picked good sections to do changes to. Good job!

Clymernl (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)