User talk:Rimtastic

Welcome!

Hello, Rimtastic, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Blumpkin (sex act), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Blumpkin (sex act)


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Blumpkin (sex act), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bemis Manufacturing Company. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:19, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Theda 00:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Bemis Manufacturing Company. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sea photo Talk 00:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blumpkin (sex act)


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Blumpkin (sex act), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Blumpkin (sex act), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

My ban should be removed!
First of all, I can say that my name is in no way profane. I named myself Rimtastic because my car has cool spinning rims.

Now, though, I must ask you...

Why did I get banned from Wikipedia? Is it because I made an article for blumpkins? Is it because I contributed to Wikipedia? Is it because of this so-called "vandalism" that you moderators insist that I did?

It seems that Wikipedia is abandoning its duty as an encyclopedia...

Wikipedia was meant to be a gathering place of great minds to bring together knowledge from every corner of the Earth! Yet as I see my article for blumpkins being deleted by unscrupulous moderators within just five short minutes of its creation, I see quite clearly that the elite of Wikipedia considers blumpkins to be too "disgusting" to be considered knowledge.

But is reality never disgusting?

Does all sexual activity occur in a bed in the missionary position? If you declare this, then I say... !

I am no great philosopher, but I know that reality is sometimes disgusting. It is sometimes sexually deviant, as Kirk Johnson pulled open his rectal cavity and opened up not only his anal sphincter but the universe, to the great 9-centimeter-wide hole that is Goatse! Many said that this was a disgusting act, but yet it is something that revolutionized the anus and the Internet forever! Much like Goatse, blumpkins are changing the world of sex as we know it, as we see sexual activity move from the master bedroom to the lavatory! Are you moderators just going to stand there and take this article off of Wikipedia just because it is "gross", or are you going to help contribute to the article, find pictures of blumpkins and external links to every source about blumpkins that cyberspace has to offer, so that Wikipedia can truly become the great fountain of all of the knowledge of the universe, beautiful and disgusting, that it was meant to be?

The choice is yours, moderators.

Rimtastic (talk) 04:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Rimtastic


 * Were you planning to cause more disruption with also? –MuZemike 04:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * No. That's my roommate's account. Rimtastic (talk) 04:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Rimtastic
 * But my roommate is beside the point. I am on my talk page because my ban was unjust; I was only helping Wikipedia with my article about blumpkins.  Yes, I did change Bemis's article to be about blumpkins but that was really a heat of the moment thing out of my frustration over you moderators attacking my article on blumpkins.  But my account is not vandalism-only, as that was my only time doing vandalism.  You moderators, though, are far worse.  You are the ones telling us not to vandalize Wikipedia pages, but then you go and vandalize my page on blumpkins!  You moderators are hypocrites, vandals with banhammers.  If I was a moderator, Wikipedia would be in better hands.  I would only ban true vandals, and blumpkins would not be removed from this website.  I do not understand why you accuse me of vandalism when you moderators are twice the vandals I am. Rimtastic (talk) 04:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)Rimtastic