User talk:RinBlack

Proposed deletion of The Black Rose Series
Hello, RinBlack. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Black Rose Series, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shadowcat/Isabella Masters


The article Shadowcat/Isabella Masters has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Character from non-notable book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Rose/Candice Redfield


The article Black Rose/Candice Redfield has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable book, only a few sales links can be found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:09, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Shadowcat/Isabella Masters for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shadowcat/Isabella Masters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Black Rose Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Black Rose/Candice Redfield for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Rose/Candice Redfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Black Rose Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Black Rose Series for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Black Rose Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Black Rose Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:05, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Notability
I thought I'd explain why your pages are getting nominated for deletion. (I am going to assume that you are the author of the books or someone who knows her.) To put it bluntly, it is because the series as a whole does not pass our notability guidelines for books. (WP:NBOOK) It exists, but it doesn't seem to have gained any coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) that would show that it is notable. All I can find are things such as WP:PRIMARY sources (things that you release) or merchant sources, neither of which can show notability. The thing about reliable sources is that they must be independent of you, meaning that they can't have an interest in seeing you get attention (meaning that they don't get profit from sales of your books). Even if you get say, a review on a blog, that doesn't mean that it's a reliable source because most blogs don't have the editorial process that we need for it to be reliable. The same goes for any reviews on merchant websites. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:08, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:The Black Rose Series Book 1 Covor.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Black Rose Series Book 1 Covor.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 16 January 2014 (UTC)