User talk:Ringbang/Archive 0

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:37, Dec 12, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Greetings
A page that you joined to help with associate with other members of the Wikipedia community is on VfD. Please see Votes for deletion/Wikipedian citizens of the world, and the related page Votes for deletion/Wikipedian supporters of the sovereign nation-state. Cognition 09:53, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Regarding your addition of the cleanup notice to Banana slug
I'm slightly skeptical about your choice to add a cleanup tag to the Banana slug article, I'll be open minded about how we can improve the article. In any case, it would be helpful if you described what needs to be cleaned up on the article's talk page. Thanks! &mdash; Ambush Commander (Talk) 22:09, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

APA reference templates
Thanks for your comments regarding my use of the book reference template. It's very clear that you understand the relevant concerns at a far greater level of detail than I do, and I certainly accept your judgement on these matters. It will take me a while to fully digest your explanation and to examine the policy pages you cite. (I had looked at some of them a few months ago, but it looks like some of the discussion/explanation has been expanded since then.) If it would be wise to revert or adjust  the change I made to use Template:Book reference you or someone else should go ahead and do it.

I think if there are deficiencies in the template that these should repaired if possible. Editions for chess references is an interesting issue. In most cases that I know of, the edition isn't particularly important since we don't generally give page or even chapter references in chess articles, and most chess books change relatively little between editions. In important cases where the edition really does matter, it's often part of the title, as with Modern Chess Openings. The one area where I think it could really help is chess books that have been reprinted for many years. For example, Reuben Fine's The Ideas Behind the Chess Openings: Algebraic Edition, was published in 1990 (ISBN 0812917561), so it may seem not too old. The book is essentially identical to the first printing (dating to 1948 I think) with trivial substitution of algebraic notation for the original descriptive chess notation, so it is very much out of date. (It's certainly still interesting from a historical perspective, and some parts are still relevant.) It would be useful to be able to indicate that the book was originally printed in 1948, but today you will find it easier to get an essentially identical 1990 copy with this ISBN. Quale 17:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC)

AFD on The Dumpy Downie Duo
You added the AFD tag to The Dumpy Downie Duo article but didn't carry out the other steps. I have done that for you. You can discuss the potential deletion here. --TheParanoidOne 22:58, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, TheParanoidOne, I never got back to that one. &mdash; Ringbang 14:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Sugar Pine
I just saw your addition to Sugar Pine. Thanks for that and for your other contributions to Wikipedia. Cheers, -Willmcw 22:26, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for the kind words! Likewise, I was really glad to see your contributions concerning naturalism and native Californian tribal cultures. The photos are gorgeous as well. &mdash; Ringbang 17:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Grundig
You changed my edit that the Grundig brand is owned by Eton only in the US back to its original, innacurate form. Alba/Beko own the brandname everywhere else, and operate a company behind it, so I'm reverting --Kiand 18:07, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
 * You caught me in the middle of a revision. Several recent updates to this article disrupted the chronology. I've revised and merged-in the changes, along with a more detailed description of the roles of Eton, Alba, and Beko. Please take any further discussion of the Grundig AG article to Talk:Grundig AG. &mdash; Ringbang 21:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

roar
R, Your cleanup of roar was indeed helpful. It's been something of combination disabig page and actual article for quite a while. that said, I have to ask where you put the content of the article part? I can't seem to locate it. ww 22:53, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

National Missionary Baptist Convention of America
Hi. I noticed that you added the confusing tag to the National Missionary Baptist Convention of America article. When you have a chance, would you post any suggestions you might have on the Talk:National Missionary Baptist Convention of America page. Thanks. - Rlvaughn 02:47, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Done. – Ringbang 16:00, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll take a look at your comments, and see if I can help the article in any way. - Rlvaughn 00:43, 18 November 2005 (UTC)

New user box
Hello Ringbang, It's SWD316. Im giving you the user box for your user page called Template:User Member. It's a user box that says your a member of the AWWDMBJ.... Hope you like it! — M o e   ε  03:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

World Citizen userbox,
Hi, I noticed the message saying you're a World Citizen, I would like to invite you to add to your user page if you wish to proclaim it in a more effective way, and this template will also add you automatically to the Wikipedians with World Citizenship category. :) --Mistress Selina Kyle 23:54, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Re:Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!
I've been a member for like a year, and although I should have labeled it as "sources" instead of "external links" I still linked where I got it from and put copyright violations in quotes.

Fake edit: Okay, I just compared said articles. I did plagiarize. At the time I did not understand the Wikipedia. Thanks for the heads up. --Snafuu 22:10, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Offenbach
Hi, I'm writing to explain why I have reverted Offenbach to the version with French capitalization of the titles.

The reason for this is that we are using French (German, Italian etc.) capitalization (consistently) for opera titles. The guidlelines for operas are explained on the Opera Project main page WikiProject Opera. As you will have seen we are using some English titles and those obviously follow English capitalization rules. Regards.

Kleinzach 17:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks for the note. However, I didn't change the capitalization from French to English form, I corrected the use of French capitalization. Please read the note I wrote about it on Talk:Jacques Offenbach; I think you'll find that my corrections are appropriate for the French language. – Ringbang 17:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Hi. I have now replied to your comment on the Offenbach talk page. While I agree with the (American?) writer on the About.com page about there being different ways of capitalizing French, I think if you look at what we have been doing - over some time and many pages - you will see that we have been using one of them.

We follow the French style used by the publishers Macmillan & Co. when they produced the New Grove Dictionary of Opera. That is our reference. We are not trying to invent anything new here.

Hope that is clearer now. Regards.

Kleinzach 17:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

I see you have also changed La belle Hélène and the WikiProject Opera/Opera Corpus page I have been writing! Is there anything else you have changed? Can you please let me know.

Kleinzach 18:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

MA Userbox
Today, there was a merger of Category:Martial Artist Wikipedians into Category:Wikipedian martial artists. This resulted in a userbox being added to the category. This userbox is available to you. TonyTheTiger 21:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Mystery meat navigation
I have added a "" template to the article Mystery meat navigation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Mathmo Talk 01:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gent_magazine_(April_1990;_Chessie_Moore_cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gent_magazine_(April_1990;_Chessie_Moore_cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:36, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gent_magazine_(April_1990;_Chessie_Moore_cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gent_magazine_(April_1990;_Chessie_Moore_cover).jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 17:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Spam in Phonic Corporation
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Phonic Corporation, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Phonic Corporation is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Phonic Corporation, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Phonic Corporation itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Whitesnake - Lovehunter CD cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Whitesnake - Lovehunter CD cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Crstsk (talk) 06:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shirttales.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shirttales.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Barbi-Twins-Adventures-1a.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Barbi-Twins-Adventures-1a.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Project FMF (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Eddy Grant

 * Is your username a reference to the "new genre" of island music created by Eddy Grant? Just wondering. Best, tomasz.  14:17, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, you've got it. Although I like ringbang music and soca, I was especially inspired by the way Grant described ringbang as a feeling and not just a music genre. Ringbang (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Frenemy AfD
I noticed that you voted twice in this AfD. You see, as a nominator you automatically vote as delete and it now appears as if you voted twice, a practice discouraged in an AfD discussion. I just want to suggest that you strike out your second vote with markup (just the vote, not the comment) so as to avoid any confusion for other participants. LeaveSleaves talk 17:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Restore Our Associational Rights
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Restore Our Associational Rights, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no notability established, orphaned

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Tomdobb (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Ringbang. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete JAGE, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion without specifying a criterion for speedy deletion because of the following concern: Please remember that only pages meeting any criterion for speedy deletion can be speedy deleted - software (even non-notable one) is not included in any of them. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards  So Why  09:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Popjapantv-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Popjapantv-logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Agaritine
A tag has been placed on Agaritine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Riotrocket8676  You gotta problem with that? 22:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Frieda Friedman
This article you created back in 2005 is a biography of a living person which lacks sufficient sources and runs the risk of deletion. I've added one (not particularly good one) and a reflist but this is not really enough. I'm not sufficiently familiar with this author's work to be able to do more and I'm hoping that you will be able to revisit the article and improve it. Someone else has also added an WP:Orphan tag, so this is another area which needs attention.--Plad2 (talk) 07:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional television shows
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fictional television shows. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of fictional television shows (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your "bonobo" edit
Please find me the citation that the idea that bonobos are a "third human" is widely accepted. That's what I thought: there aren't any. All this was, was a publicity stunt by chimpanzee researchers seeking to gain focus for preservation efforts. And while preservation efforts are laudable, marketing is NOT science.

SCIENCE shows that humans and chimpanzees are LESS similar than previously thought:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-chimp-gene-gap-wide

So, if you don't like a "tacked on" balancing point of view, I suggest you rewrite the entire section, noting that ideas of chimpanzees as "humans" are nowhere near scientific consensus or validity.

Ryoung 122 17:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi there. You sound very, very angry. Did you write the content in question? I appreciate that, like me, you have a love for science and the pursuit of an increasingly accurate understanding of the most fascinating subject of all: life. Rewriting the section to be more accurate and cohesive in its entirety sounds like a great idea. &mdash; Ringbang (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Feck
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Feck, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.reference.com/browse/Feck, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Feck and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Feck, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Feck with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Feck. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Feck saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Yumegusa (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Copy was in opposite direction. Sorry. --Yumegusa (talk) 23:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:29, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:CiCA-DocZilla-logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CiCA-DocZilla-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Latest stable software release/DocZilla
A tag has been placed on Template:Latest stable software release/DocZilla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. Miami33139 (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Trimethylglycine
Thanks for your edits on this article, which for various reasons has caught my attention. If you think that my edits are heavy handed or off somehow, then just revert and offer advice on the talk page. Many articles of this type are semi-overwhelmed by those keen on nutritional supplements, and I have found a focus on the basic chem & biochem and on the main technology is more helpful and more objective for readers, probably. --Smokefoot (talk) 04:04, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Neutron star core compositions
Thanks for the work you've been doing tidying up neutron star. With regards to the core compositions, though, WP:MOS says bulletted lists are discouraged. If you can see a good way to convert that section into prose that's more readable than the previous version, that'd probably be the best option (otherwise someone will likely just revert it on MOS grounds). --Christopher Thomas (talk) 05:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Christopher, thanks for the heads up as well as the acknowledgment. I'll be happy to recast the content as a unified paragraph. Ringbang (talk) 05:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Datura Common Names
Hello Ringbang, and thanks for your recent edits on Datura. I do have some comments for you on parts of your edit at the talk:Datura  page. Tom Hulse (talk) 20:52, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 16:35, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

Spelling, etc., deficiencies in Fourth Estate
My insignificant tweaks did't really make enough of a difference to justify the removal of your tag, but I couldn't see what else was needed. Anything still to be done there? --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:07, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:59, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:42, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 20:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 15:44, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

Hard candy
Regarding this edit: This is not an acceptable way to move a page, because it separates the page from its edit history. Now an admin will have to perform a history merge (histmerge) to repair the separation. The only correct way to move a page is by using the move tab or, if that is not possible because the page already exists, enlisting the intercession of an admin by proposing the move through the requested move procedure. I know you meant well, but please don't move any more pages by cut and paste. Best,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  22:25, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Declined speedies on Internet business card
You tagged this article as A1, A3, and A7. It is neither of these. It's not A1 because the subject of the article is easily identifiable. It's not A3 because it has content other than external links, category tags and "see also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, chat-like comments, template tags, or images. It's not A7, because it is neither a real person, individual animal, organization, or web content. Feel free to propose deletion. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 17:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:06, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ann Dunnigan


The article Ann Dunnigan has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable - translators aren't inherently notable, and she has not achieved notability in any other field. The NYT ref is her obituary, which is not enough on it's own to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dawn Bard (talk) 03:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Sugar pine
Hello Ringbang. I moved the article as you requested. I see that the spelling within the article also needs fixing (Sugar Pine should be replaced by Sugar pine, or sugar pine). Do you have time to take care of that? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
 * See User talk:Hesperian. It seems that moving the article yet again, to Pinus lambertiana, is best. Would you be happy with that? If you disagree, can you leave a comment at User talk:Hesperian? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:46, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of High Speed (video game)


The article High Speed (video game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I could not find any significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Prod per WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Odie5533 (talk) 03:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of E-Prime (software)


A tag has been placed on E-Prime (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Secret account 04:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 9f94ecaa9617e22d4dd49257fb788228
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Hogan's Alley (video game), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page National Guard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 11:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:47, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Type 7


The article Type 7 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * not notable this page has only has one sentence.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LES 953 (talk) 15:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Telugu films of 1981 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Sharada, Bapu, Jayanthi, Karthik, Madhavi, Gummadi, K. Subba Rao, Chandramohan, Geetha, Todu Dongalu and Deepa

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:02, 4 April 2012 (UTC)