User talk:Rionon

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rashmi Robot (February 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rashmi Robot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rashmi Robot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rashmi_Robot Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Rashmi_Robot reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello Rionon. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rionon. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 21:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I am no way connected to Rashmi robot commercially and don't have any financial stake in it at all. I am just a freelance writer who thinks that this advanced robot is not well informed on the related wiki pages

You can search Rashmi robot info on Google and can find that these pages missed the information about this one of the important humanoid robots invented so far

I also believe that I added only relavent information about the robot which was missing from the page

So here I request you to please restore my changes on the different robot related pages

Thanks and regards Rionon (talk) 23:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Even if you're not being paid, what you're doing is indistinguishable from advertising - writing non-neutrally and adding mentions and images to every article you can find. MrOllie (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Your objection seems to be specific with Rashmi Robot, there are many other robot's picture on the page, are you comfortable with those pictures? Thanks and regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rionon (talk • contribs)


 * I am comfortable with long standing images that are backed by a consensus of editors, yes. - MrOllie (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Robot. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 02:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you please explain how it is a promotion as this robot was in news for long time, can you please explore about this robot little bit, can you see google search frequency for this article? do you not think information of this robot should be on wikipedia. Please apply your rule on all the similar articles available Rionon (talk)
 * Wikipedia is supposed to be written neutrally, see WP:NPOV. We don't go on about how advanced and important things are or write about what sorts of endorsements things have gotten. - MrOllie (talk) 03:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Can you please point it out what content in this article seems to you as endorsement, I can remove those parts as you can see all the parts of the content has a citation or reference Rionon


 * I fixed numerous instances of promotional text, as well as many instances of grammatical errors, and you added back all the promotional stuff and improperly written sentences without comment. You must allow others to improve the article. - MrOllie (talk) 21:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Ok I just corrected a spelling mistake and added an vital word Rionon (talk) 22:00, 24 October 2021 (UTC)