User talk:Rip21

Patrick Tucker-Pfieffer
The article Patrick Tucker-Pfieffer has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appeared to have no meaningful content or history, and the text was unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:41, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Patrick tucker-pfieffer
A tag has been placed on Patrick tucker-pfieffer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George The Dragon (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Patrick tucker-pfieffer
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Patrick tucker-pfieffer, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  04:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:NPA
I'm assuming you are also 68.49.0.188, correct? I have no idea what point you're trying to make, nor do I really care since I had nothing to do with it. From what I can figure out, you had an article on yourself deleted, and you're ticked off about it so you've decided to attack others. Don't do that, labeling edits as "Speedy delete your life" is a clear violation of the personal attacks rule. Redrocket (talk) 05:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Kill yourself.--Rip21 (talk) 14:00, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
 * In concurance with RR, yes, I would say you tried to make a page about yourself. Even if it was written badly, and basically nonsense, well, biographies on one's self are not allowed in wikipedia, as per its policies.  An article on a person may only be included if that person was notable, a good example would be one of the old ministers of Canada, or a past president of the US, or someone that invented a new, and easier way of doing something that is very important.  You get the idea, either way, the point being, the article you made on yourself did not assert the noblity of yourself, and would have been deleted anyway even if it was written well.—  Dæ dαlus[mailto:Daedalus969@gmail.com →]quick link / Improve 18:54, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Just to clarify, the article was not about the editor. It was complete nonsense - things like how a can of soda and a grain of sand formed a baby (I may be way off on the details but it was nonsensical stuff like that). -- Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  19:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  Neil N   talk  ♦  contribs  16:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)