User talk:Ripley44mag

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Presidents of the United States by appearance on currency, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ''' Gfoley4 &#124; Need to chat? My track record ''' 01:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Ricasso
Hi. Welcome to wikipedia! Your recent edit to Ricasso didn't work - images on wikipedia have to be uploaded first. I'll assume your edit was well intentioned - if you need some help, reply here and let me know. Bigger digger (talk) 21:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome

 * }

US Grant half dollar
Welcome Ripley44mag. On the Ulysses S. Grant page I see you tried to link to an external source to display an image, a photograph you took of a Grant, 1922, US Half dollar. I took the liberty of capturing the photo and uploaded it to commons upload section. As someone else has already informed you, images must be uploaded first and the proper source and copyright information must be included. In any event.. NICE PHOTO! Gwillhickers (talk) 19:31, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brown and serve bag


The article Brown and serve bag has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced dicdef.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 12:54, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Coin doctor


The article Coin doctor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced possible neologism.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 13:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Swamper (occupational title)


The article Swamper (occupational title) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced dicdef.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 13:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Getting pinked


A tag has been placed on Getting pinked requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Teapot  george Talk  13:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Getting pinked, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  14:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Brown and serve bag for deletion
The article Brown and serve bag is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brown and serve bag until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 00:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)