User talk:Ripomobo11

Please follow the guidelines
⚠️ Hi,  again did vandalism by deleting discussion on Admin'a notice board about him. Ripomobo11, please stop this, you don't have to delete discussion there, before closing it. You also did unsourced editing on Joe Root, Yazuvendra Chahal etc articles and removed material before discussing on Talk page. Your grasp on Eng isn't looking strong. I assume your from Telangana if yes, I suggest you to edit WP in Telugu on Telugu WP (I don't know Telugu WP is exist or not), You can also edit on Hindi WP. You have to avoid adding unsourced material & removing sourced form articles.Success think (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

No man I am not from telengana and yes it is not unsourced in Joe root, one there is no citation for verification and in yuzi chahal, I remove chess because he play chess only in district levels which is not mandatory to mention because it is a type of hobby Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

, did you read Yazuvendra Chahal article properly, you not. If you did you will already have known that Chahal has represented India at national level in Greece at Youth championship and at Kozhikode, Kerala in a You Asian chess championship. All the citation's for this are present in 'Refrence' section below that article. Your removing sourced info without reading the articles. I suggest to go on Chahal article and check, what I'm saying is wrong or right. Your causing trouble for fellow WP editors. You have to read properly before doing any changes. You can discuss on Talk page. Success think (talk) 17:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

There are many national chess players which don't have any Wikipedia pages yet, if the player is international, I will definitely mention but he is not so that's why I removed it Ripomobo11 (talk) 02:03, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Times of India article says that he represented Ind at youth compititions in at Kerala & Greece. You don't have to remove it. This type of work is called as Vandalism. If you know othere chess player who don't have WP article and have WP: Significant covarage, reliable published articles abt them, you create article about them or submit one after creating in your WP: Sandbox for review. Success think (talk) 04:16, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

, which is your native lang? We have nearly every language Wikipedia, be it Hindi, Bhojpuri, Tamil, Marathi, Bengali, you can join them and can share your knowledge. Success think (talk) 04:29, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Faf du Plessis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Megan B....  It’s all coming to me till the end of time  14:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Martin Guptill. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:45, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martin Guptill was changed by Ripomobo11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858757 on 2022-01-15T03:45:28+00:00

No vandalism
There is no vandalism I have done I am cricket expert I know more about the game Ripomobo11 (talk) 03:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sea Cow (talk) 03:57, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Glenn Maxwell have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Glenn Maxwell was changed by Ripomobo11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935169 on 2022-01-17T04:52:45+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Faf du Plessis. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Faf du Plessis was changed by Ripomobo11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908503 on 2022-01-17T05:38:20+00:00

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Faf du Plessis have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:48, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Faf du Plessis was changed by Ripomobo11 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.869412 on 2022-02-13T13:48:14+00:00

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Brendan Taylor, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. You removed the citation for the text. David Biddulph (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Suresh Raina, you may be blocked from editing. You also added misplaced external links. David Biddulph (talk) 20:59, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rashid Khan, you may be blocked from editing. Storchy (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Ripomobo11! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 17:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Rahul Chaudhari. bonadea contributions talk 07:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Rahul Chaudhari
It is hard to remain patient when you push so hard to remove the neutral tone and add such extraordinary superlatives. You do not yet even know had to add sources correctly, let alone what constitutes reliability. I suspect that if you keep going like this, you might find yourself blocked. I don't think that would be ideal, so I hope you will reflect on editors' comments. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Some Wikipedia guidelines for you to read
Hello again. You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Removing reliable sources
Please stop removing reliable sources, such as The Hindu and Sportskeeda, with an edit summary claiming that they are unreliable, as you did in edits including here, here, and here. If you want to learn more about Wikipedia's guidelines for reliable sources, please read Reliable sources. Storchy (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Sportskeeda is considered to be generally unreliable. See this discussion. This script highlights links to sources that have been discussed and found to be (at best) questionable, and I think it's very useful. --bonadea contributions talk 23:03, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Mean I have done right? Ripomobo11 (talk) 02:08, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If there is an established consensus that Sportskeeda is unreliable, then yes that should be removed: for some reason there's no mention of it in Reliable sources/Perennial sources. But you are also removing WP:THEHINDU, and now CricInfo in this edit:, where you again replaced factual information with your own opinion: "an all rounder known for his innovative shots" Why? Storchy (talk) 10:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

That's not my own opinion, I think you have not seen cricket. Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:50, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It's fine to add to an article that a notable commentator said "Maxwell was an all rounder known for his innovative shots", supported by a reliable source. That's reporting someone notable expressing an opinion, rather than adding our own. Storchy (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

......No words Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

I think the link I Have given in your talk page have given the reason for innovation. Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * At my talk page, you posted this link. That's a low-notability cricket blog entry, with unknown reliability. But if we quoted a national newspaper saying "Sunil Gavaskar said, 'player so-and-so was the best fielder I've ever known in Indian cricket'", then we would be reporting the fact that Gavaskar had said something, without commenting on whether Gavaskar was right or not. Storchy (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Final and last time here the other link now please let me do my work I don't have time to corrupt Wikipedia https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/2263134#:~:text=With%20Wahab%20Riaz%20bowling%20one,walkaway%20cut%2Dshot%20pull' Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Storchy
Don't know why are you doing such things I have given link and write what is written in them. And I think for you icc and ESPN are not reliable. Thank you for corrupting Wikipedia Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Your recent editing history at Suresh Raina shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Storchy (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

.....no words again Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

If there is written on Sachin Wikipedia that it is one of the greatest batsman than will it be fan based for you .i think you should wanted to bother me Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

And I repeatedly message on talk page but you are not making any way Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on MS Dhoni. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 13:44, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Andile Phehlukwayo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Anrich Nortje.  Cassiopeia  talk  07:09, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at User talk:Ripomobo11. Comment on content, not on fellow editors.  Cassiopeia  talk  22:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop vandalism on Dhoni article
Your recent edit on Dhoni isn't looking constructive. You have to avoid such behaviour and if you don't have commanded on Eng language you to take help from other editors from Teahouse. You did vandalism 9n the 1st line of that article - You wrote 'MS Dhoni is former profesional Cricketer' but it is wrong he is still a professional cricketer, he still plays for Chennai Super Kings in IPL. He did not retired from IPL yet. He receives money for playing for them, if you recieve money for playing means your profesional sport person. Now before doing any edit, please discusse on concerned article's talk page.Success think (talk) 03:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Mean the word former proffesional is wrong, so can I use just proffesional Ripomobo11 (talk) 06:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes you can write,' he is a professional cricketer and former international cricketer'. If you don't know meaning discuss on talk page, your actions on this article today is considered as Vandalism, you first read Biography articles to understand the rules of WP.Success think (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop using WP: Fan POV, fan language on cricketer's article. Your doing grammatical mistakes by adding full stop after Citation. WP don't allow Original research. When other editors provide you Blue links please read them. Success think (talk) 09:03, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

OK I am sorry for that grammatical mistakes but I don't write in fan language for an example it is written in Wikipedia pages of that Kumar sangakara, Sachin Tendulkar, etc are one of the the greatest batsman and wicketkeepers of all time respectively so why you don't edit those page it also count as a fan language isn't it or don't think editors who write those words are also doing vandalism  Ripomobo11 (talk) 09:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Tendulkar, Sangakara and Don Bradman are examples exceptional talent. You can't compare them with Suresh Raina etc. And the lines in these articles, who says they are widely considered as one of all time great, have lots of compound citations not just 1 article of news but articles from prestigious organization like Times, Wisden. ICC inducted them in hall of fame. Don't compare apples with oranges. Success think (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

OK not for suresh Raina but you can without any doubt easily write these words for Ms dhoni, here are links of prestigious website https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/five-indians-in-dhoni-led-wisden-dream-team/story-cd9YpPQYKsTdgf53ZTGylK.html https://www.icc-cricket.com/video/1907371 https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/155157 https://wisden.com/almanack/ms-dhoni-almanack-tribute https://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/content/records/284025.html https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/612390 Ripomobo11 (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Even for Don Bradman, Lionel Messi no write on WP that he is greatest player in the world, here in WP, we write 'Bradman, Messi is widely considered as one of the greatest'. And for writing this 1 line, One article is not enough or website like Sportskeeda is not enough. You can't put forward unreliable person's article for this like you cited M.Azurudin, he is a match fixer, he is not reputed, reliable source. If you want to write, MSD is one of the greatest, you have to provide reliable sources not only just 1 website source but also from physical magazines, books written on Dhoni, Newspaper articles, for you have to create compund Citation, you can learn how to create it from My 1st article, Of you don't read this now other editors will undo your edits in just 1 click. So take a time and read this How to give source in WP. You can ask further questions on Help place for new editors like you, You can join Special group who edit articles about Cricket, Editor's group who edit articles about IPLSuccess think (talk) 04:06, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Are these links work for you or you need more https://www.timesnownews.com/sports/cricket/article/adam-gilchrist-picks-best-wicket-keeper-between-ms-dhoni-brendon-mccullum-and-kumar-sangakkara/632295 https://www.dnaindia.com/cricket/news-kapil-dev-picks-ms-dhoni-as-keeper-in-kapil-xi-team-says-no-one-can-touch-his-spot-2858163 https://www.hindustantimes.com/cricket/it-s-very-very-tough-why-sangakkara-prefers-dhoni-over-ganguly-as-a-batsman-in-odis/story-gvRI06qpVxtXzw6CzxILnI.html Ripomobo11 (talk) 08:00, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

In these Adam Gilchrist ,sangakara, and kapil Dev mentioned about his wicket keeping, batting etc will these work or not  Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

And I have read all the policies. In short it shouldn't be sponsored, should be of reliable website, unbiased, etc Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@Sucess think reply Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hyperlinks not allowed
Twice now, you have inserted hyperlinks into the text. Hyperlinks are not allowed. If the URLs are valid, those can be used as references, but not hyperlinks. David notMD (talk) 10:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

So what to do only add one link Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

THIS is a not-allowed hyperlink: "He is known for his destructive batting, he is well regarded as one of the greatest wicketkeeper batsmans ."

AND THIS is the same URL formatted as a referemce: "He is known for his destructive batting, he is well regarded as one of the greatest wicketkeeper batsmans.

Also see Help:Referencing for beginners. I hope this explains the difference. David notMD (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

So what have to do Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Mean we have to add one link that describes all not twice Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Ripomobo11, your edit here is rather concerning. David nMD removed an inappopriate link you'd added and let you know that hyperlinks are not allowed; unfortunately, you added the link again anyway, saying in the edit summary that you didn't understand, and asking people to let you know before they make an edit. That's not how Wikipedia works, and you have already had warnings about edit warring. Have you had time to read this information yet? It is really important that you read and understand it. --bonadea contributions talk 19:54, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * To reinforce this, ANY NUMBER of hyperlinks is forbidden. If you continue to repeat the same error you will be blocked from editing, either for a fixed period of time, or indefintely. David notMD (talk) 21:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Can't able to understand are my links invalid or the words I used are invalid and what about hyperlink you are saying? Ripomobo11 (talk) 01:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You added words, and added hyperlinks as references. Hyperlinks are not allowed in an article. For this reason, the words and the hyperlinks were removed. If the words are true, then a proper reference is required. Above, I copied your sentence: "He is known for his destructive batting, he is well regarded as one of the greatest wicketkeeper batsmans." and I turnd your hyperlink into a reference. With the hyperlink = wrong. As a reference = right. David notMD (talk) 10:47, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

PLEASE STOP
You may be blocked from editing without further warning ''

As far back as January, you have repeatedly either added content without a reference, or else inserted hyperlinks as "references." Both actions are wrong, which is why all of your efforts have been reverted. Please stop doing what you are doing. Learn how to create a reference. If you are reverted, start a discussion on the Talk page. Wikipedia requires competence (see WP:CIR). You have not exhibited competence. The next step is that you will be indefinitely blocked. David notMD (talk) 11:40, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

You have not replied what I said Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

You can ask all your questions on Teahouse, a friendly space for new editors. Also read guide for editing Biography articles. Success think (talk) 13:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * You asked "Can't able to understand are my links invalid or the words I used are invalid and what about hyperlink you are saying?" My clear answer is that it is always wrong to insert hyperlinks into the text of an article. That does not count as refs. The hyperlinks and your text will always be reverted, even if the text is true. You are making work for other editors. David notMD (talk) 14:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

He doesn't understand hyperlink, word, you don't understand it yet. Success think (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

No help no reply My story so far
I agree for those grammatical mistakes, but I don't agree for those revert every one is doing with my edit, one editor say don't add hyperlink and then I managed to use reference not hyperlink, again an editor came an revert it saying this is fan based and it's a vandalism despite giving reference of renowned website such as ESPN, icc, etc and reference of words said by former cricketers when they comment on him. I .....just!! No words Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:46, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Stop writing unsourced material on Cricket related articles
Your breaching WP Policies by adding unsourced material and OR, just what you did in Kumar Sangakkara. In nearly every Cricket related article your writing ' this player greatest player', stop this. Every Cricket fan knows, who is great and who is worst, they don't need your lines. WP is not for to praise your favourite players. Don't do this without providing 3 to 4 WP: reliable sources like books, magazines, research papers. WP don't work the way your thinking. We provide here just overview from SC. Otherwise your editing privileges may be invoked by WP: Administrators.Success think (talk) 11:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

What I did is what you have said to me, you have said this type of word 'greatest of all time ' are fan based, so don't confuse me more I have provide some reliable resource in my talk please watch them and then I will edit Ms dhoni page. Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

And yes in page of Kumar sangakara no link is added for reference Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You have to add references without it you can't write, what you think is true. Your information may be true but WP don't allow WP: Original research. WP highly discourage to praise some or criticise on WP articles. No need to write this player is great, best or greatest. You can add Citation for a physical book also. Go to library find info and write in your own words, don't copy word by word. Success think (talk) 12:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

OK OK OK, I wasted my time on this wp. I don't know why you are bothering me but from now I never do edit on Ms dhoni. I don't need to add it because over a billion people all over the world know his capability. But person who's capability are hidden like Kumar and sanga need this word greatest of all time. Bye expect to not see you soon Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

And if it is not mandatory to write player is great best or greatest, so please remove these words from wp pages of Sachin, sanga, ponting McGrath, de villiers, malinga, Mitchell starc, muttiah murlidharan, mahela jawardhne, Jacques Kallis, virat kohli, viv Richards, Brian Lara, walse, etc and if you not It considerd as vandalism Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You can complainant this here at Teahouse otherwise you'll be Block. Success think (talk) 13:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey Mr this is my own talk page not yours go from here Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * They have every right to communicate with you on your talk page. See WP:OWN. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

He is without any reason saying to block me, this type of speech can not expected here Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm trying to understand what the issue is here since you do seem to be attempting to communicate. Would you mind trying to explain the situation to me? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, I disagree with when they said "you can complainant this here [sic] at the Teahouse" as the Teahouse is definitely not the place to complain about a disagreement. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

, No one have intentions to bother you. We can understand your new on WP and it takes time to learn. My advice to you is just avoid writing, bla bla bla is great, one of the great. You can contribute by other way by correcting grammatical errors by doing Minor edits, I assume you have good faith. Don't get discourage, keep learning and keep editing but with provide WP: Citations. If some wrote in blue colour words on your talk page, it means they want you to click on that blue words and read it properly and understand, Happy editing. Hi, This user have lots of questions about editing on WP, that's why I said him to ask to more experienced editors on Teahouse. I think he have good intentions and he can learn. Revoking editing rights is not good option here. Teahouse will ans his questions, if he asked there, that's all. Success think (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * by the way, you accidentally transcluded the contents of User:Ripomobo11 to this page instead of pinging them. don't worry, they've probably been automatically notified of your post just by you posting here. happy editing! &#128156; melecie   talk  - 14:02, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Sure @Blaze wolf for an example it is written in Wikipedia pages of cricketers like viv Richards, Mitchell starc, lasith malinga,sachin Tendulkar, sangakara, Ricky ponting, Brian Lara, Adam Gilchrist, mark boucher ,Jacques Kalli's, dale steyn, Stuart broad etc that they are greatest, great or best .for sure they are the greatest, but when I try to add such word like great best in one of The cricketer Ms dhoni ,the person is saying that this is vandalism, fan based, not allowed despite I have given reference of renowned website and every cricketer regarded him as one of the best.there should be no despute about his capability whatsover ,if you ask any person that who are the greatest wicket keeper batsman of all time, any one of them definitely say Ms dhoni  Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Ah alright. I'm not sure if it saying that they are "the greatest" is already there is true or not, however it should be removed if it is as that violates WP:NPOV. Wikipedia tries to keep a neutral point of view in articles, and saying someone is the greatest isn't really neutral because that is simply someone opinion, and someone else might not think the same thing. ― Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 14:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * generally if an article says that someone is great, it points to the sources (with an s) that say that they are, and even then remains neutral in writing such as saying "is widely regarded as one of the greatest". a lot of citations are probably needed to prove this as well, Viv Richards has five supporting that statement for example. happy editing! &#128156; melecie   talk  - 14:18, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

I also have a lot of link to add in reference to show the greatest @blaze wolf, if guarantee me he will not revert it as he do with every single edit I do Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

I will also add 5 link Ripomobo11 (talk) 14:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.David notMD (talk) 14:33, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

, A discussion about your editng and all the stuffs your doing is taking place at, I suggest you to avoid writing uncited material on WP. But some editors also assuming you have Good faith|Good faith, not considering your activities as vandalism. I also assume your have good faith but you have to follow the guidelines.Success think (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Do you need help?
Hello,

I saw that some editors have opened a discussion about you on the Administrator's Noticeboard. There are some concerns about your editing. You seem to be confused about how to cite sources, as well as some of Wikipedia's other policies. Would you like me to help mentor you, to help you learn your way around here? ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes please Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:15, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Every user don't try to understand, they think them more genius Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:19, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, where would you like to begin, what questions do you have right now? ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:28, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Only question I have why they are reverting my edit despite I have proofs of reliable sources Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

You have to Ping him, otherwise how he'll know you want his help. You also have to read WP: Wikiholic. Success think (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

he wants your help and tell him how to ping, how to add bunch of citations without a mess.Success think (talk) 15:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Success think Thank you. I'm watching this page.  I'll teach Ripomobo11 how to ping later.~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Success think, I don't want your help please please otherwise I leave wiki pedia forever Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well, earlier on this page I see that you were not citing the sources correctly. When you have a source you want to cite, you should type after the citation.  Also, it seems you were providing the URL of a webpage as a citation.  That's better than nothing, but ideally we would like you to use a citation template.  Why don't you tell me one source you are trying to cite and I'll help you figure out how to cite it properly? ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@ONUnicorn yes I want to learn how to add bunch of citations Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Ok, tell me one, and I'll help you with it. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:42, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Are providing URL not allowed Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Providing the URL is allowed here on your talk page. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi, we're trying to help you. You have to listen ONUnicorn carefully, happy editing.Success think (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @Success think Would you please let me and Ripomobo11 talk here? Thanks. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 15:49, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Ex this cite https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/155157 Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:47, 16 March 2022 (UTC) Please friend can we talk on this tomorrow it's night in my country Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:50, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok, for that I would use a cite web template. You need to provide as much of the information it asks for as possible.  As you can see, that page does not provide a lot of the information the template asks for like the author's name or the date it was published.  Just fill out as much as you can. Once you've filled it out and put it in the article next to the information you are trying to sort it'll look like this.
 * Certianly. We can talk more tomorrow.  ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 16:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Good evening (I assume in your country it's evening now). I've taken a look at the edits you've made so far today and I think you need to slow down a lot.  is actually pretty good.  You are taking out an unsourced statement of opinion, and what you left is a complete sentence that makes sense.  Unfortunately there are a lot of issues with your other edits today.  On  you removed information from the lead that is sourced elsewhere in the article.  Some people are known for more than one thing, and it is right that the article talk about both things he is known for.  Moreover, that intro had  that neither you nor  fixed. It would have been better for you to read that article, fix the grammatical errors (if you noticed them) and if you were surprised by the information about his chess career, to read the cited sources to learn more.  However, that would have taken a little longer than you spent on that article.  In the space of 12 minutes, you edited Lugnuts' talk page, made two edits on Yuzvendra Chahal, and went on to edit Kuldeep Yadav.  I think slowing down on Yuzvendra Chahal and actually reading the article and cited sources would have enabled you to make beneficial edits and learn something about Yuzvendra Chahal that you apparently didn't know.  A lot of your other article edits today, while they haven't been reverted yet, probably will be soon.  For example,  isn't a word. And yes, everyone makes typos - I do too, and I don't always catch them.  But slowing down, checking the preview before you save the page, and reading what you've typed afterwards can help.  Lastly,  is completely inappropriate. People are asking for you to be blocked.  I hope we can avoid that - but you need to slow down, learn how to identify reliable sources, learn how to cite sources, and proof read your work. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 13:41, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Regarding identifying reliable sources - you seem to be primarily interested in Cricket. WikiProject Cricket has put together a list of books about Cricket that meet RS standards, and a guideline for how Cricket articles should be referenced, which I highly recommend you read.  I've also noticed a lot of the articles seem to be on specifically Indian cricket players.  User:Sitush has compiled some information on sources dealing with India on their user page and user subpage.  Also Reliable sources/Perennial sources is useful for identifying if some common sources are gererally reliable or not. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 14:25, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank u to recommend let me read bro and yes that word is proffesional sorry for mistake, and yes in yuzi chahal, he only have played chess only in young at district level which didn't define him that's why I removed it Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

And yes I am very good in English but I am suffering from partial cataract that's why i can't able to see properly ,resulting in speeling mistakes  Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:42, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

did you noticed that, what this user did today. Don't mislead fellow WP editors, in one edit you said, you played for India at national level in 1987 and your a national level Cricketer, but your lang is looking very formal, unofficial, when your calling fellow editors "bro", which very unlikely used by a guy who represented India in Cricket at national level in 1987. Your behaviour also is not responsible, you deleted discussion at Administrator's notic borad. Success think (talk)

Every person I said bro (brother) Mean I am giving him respect. In my country and in my team they take it as respect Ripomobo11 (talk) 01:50, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Sorry If feel hurt by saying bro or you feel unformal Ripomobo11 (talk) 01:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

you suppose to use Official lang here, avoid using "Bro", "Mate" like formal slags here. You can use 'sir' and one thing more, whenever you do edits, please make sure you write edit summary. Its a tool by which other editors, who come that article later know your changes and motive behind it. If your edit it legit, they'll not revert it, happy editing.Success think (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

@Blaze wolf, success think, David not md
First of all, you have no right to say that I am doing vandalism on my favourite cricketers, this is not true, I am a cricketer since 1987 and represented in national levels. I apply same for every cricketer which I like or don't like. I never say Ms dhoni etc is my favourite player that's why I do edit on them. I really think if a sportsperson is great then it should be mentioned like on every common great player have it on there respective Wikipedia pages .if you say it fan based then you have to remove it from all pages where it is written great. And I have already said it to @Sucess think that I will never do and edit on Ms dhoni page again desire I have reference because noone here want equality and I know more about cricket than all of you, I think in your respective countries cricket isn't popular that's why you don't know about it and most of time revert a true edit and last thing about my English, first of all I am very good in English, I have cataract problem that's why can't able to write properly, so please don't message everytime on Wikipedia administrators Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Desire * despite Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I know nothing about cricket. I have never seen a match, either live or on TV. My objections and reverts have been because Ripomobo11 broke many Wikipedia rules, including inserting hyperlinks rather than references. I believe that error has stopped. HOWEVER, I now see that Ripimobo11 is identifying edits as "minor edits." That tag is only for very small edits, such as spelling, grammar and punctuation. Also deleting referenced content with vague reasons given as Edit summaries. David notMD (talk) 21:18, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

, yesterday he also did same. He wrote some lines in Deepak Chahar etc and removed lines from Matthew Hayden. Most of the times never write the reason of edits or what he changed in edit summary and if he wrote, he write weird lines, sometimes that make no sense.Success think (talk) 03:26, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Ms dhoni article need a lot of work to do
Let us talk on this topic, there are many things need to add and need to remove to make the article healthy. Ripomobo11 (talk) 02:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

, you can provide your sources and what you what to change at MS Dhoni/Talk page in, X : What is written Y: what you to change. Success think (talk) 03:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

I can't write all the changes, needed to be done because they are too much but the major changes that should be done will be 1) length of the article is too much 2)there are some unnecessary information which are not mandatory like his father's job and his uncle said him dhauni not dhoni etc3)in 1st paragraph the most appropriate should be -Mahendra Singh Dhoni (born 7 July 1981) is an Indian professional cricketer who was captain of the Indian national cricket team from 2007 to 2017. He is a well regarded right-handed wicket-keeper batsman.[3] He led the team to three major ICC titles in year 2007,2011,and 2013 respectively. 4) for word well regarded you can use reference https://www.icc-cricket.com/news/155157 https://wisden.com/almanack/ms-dhoni-almanack-tribute And I have more if you wanted Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:13, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

you can provide this info at Talk page of MS Dhoni article. All the editors who are interested in that sub will hear you and if most of the editors agreed their, you or someone else can do the changes but for that you have to provide valid reasons, why you want these changes, and Refrences if want new info to include, happy editing. Success think (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

OK Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:28, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

just avoid grammatical mistakes, just like you did here. You don't understand English its a open fact, but your denying it again and again. Doing vandalism on cric related articles, if you not stop this you will be blocked very soon. Many editors warned you to not add unsourced material and removed sourced one from its citation. Your misleading other editors by saying your a expert, former international player, have grasp of Eng, which is clear your not. Be aware, don't do this. Success think (talk) 05:35, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Who said I am international player, I only played national level for my country representing my state and yes I specifically avoid grammatical mistake and I try to write it myself without any vandalism on the article, if you think there is some problem in article you wanted to have a chat please let me know in talk page Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

You did grammatical mistakes and added uncited material in last half hour. Its breach of WP policies & regulations. You keep edit but avoid these mistakes.Success think (talk) 05:51, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Which one name please Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

you did on Dev's article.Success think (talk) 05:56, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Stokes was born in New Zealand, not newzeland. An editor corrected your mistake. David notMD (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey mate!! Success think I am going to add "well regarded " in Ms dhoni article despite of adding one of the greatest to ensure a neutral tone and I will add one or two reference In context of word well regarded. I used reference of reliable sources. Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

David Miller
Adding unsourced material on this and Marco Jansen and Anrich Nortje, just like you did |here other South Africa cricket articles. You have to cite reliable refs or if the ref is backing your calim already present in the ref section, you can recite them or atleast tell in summary. than have to cite it and provide detail summary of your changes after editing. '''Your edits are breaking WP policy which say, you have to provide WP: source. '''Success think (talk) 09:42, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

OK mate ,I do improve Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Rohit Sharma
Hello. You removed a sentence from the lead and said Neutral tone, He hasn't achieved too much in his career so for that made him the greatest and the word outstanding can't really depicts what the editor want to say, it's often fan based, and there is no reference in respect to outstanding.

The lead does not carry citations because they are in the narrative and the lead is a summary of the narrative. If you look at the Playing style section, you will see the assessment there, supported by refs #82 and #83, which are both WP:RS.

If you disagree with the assessment, then you must present your case at the article talk page and seek WP:CONSENSUS before you can remove the content. As this article has been formally reviewed and promoted to WP:GA status, and given that its numerous contributors are presumably happy with it as it is, I think it is extremely unlikely that many will disagree with the source view that Sharma is an outstanding LOI batsman.

Please let me know if you need any further explanation. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 11:39, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hey mate! A batsman which we can use to say outstanding must have something in his career for example it either have strike rate over 90 or 100 in odi or having avg more than 50 and have more than 8000 run in either format. This achievement I should consider outstanding but in case of rohit sharma, I agree he have more than 9000 run but his avg and strike rate are both below 90 and 50 respectively.,so I or many of cricket specialist like me can't consider him outstanding. Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * For an example Abraham Benjamin devilliers which we can say outstanding but he also don't have written any word written in his wp Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I have complaint with word outstanding Ripomobo11 (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * That is your opinion, my friend, to which you are entitled, but you cannot express your own opinion in articles on this site because it breaches WP:NPOV which, rightly, is one Wikipedia's core policies. For example, I have been involved in political journalism for many years and I have to moderate my opinions about the ****ing Tory party and its appalling leader very carefully on here, often having to use sources with which I absolutely disagree. I am a keen football supporter but, whatever I may think about any team or individual personally, I find it very easy to be completely objective about sport. If you wish to edit the site on a long-term basis, you must learn to be objective and respect NPOV. I suggest you go to WP:5P and that will help you go a long way towards understanding how this site operates.
 * As for Rohit Sharma, we have WP:RS which say he is an outstanding limited overs batsman so it is in order to say that in the article and cite those sources. We do not usually accept statistical evidence because that can lead to breaches of WP:NOR, another core policy. See also WP:NOTSTATS although that is a guideline only (in this context).
 * Thanks for the quick response and I hope this helps you. Good luck. No Great Shaker (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Ok ,thanks mate Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Suresh Raina
This article need some polish because it is nowhere mention about his fielding, which has been an important part of his career that give him world recognisation. And there should be written former occasional captain not those big or lengthy sentence Eg in absence of main captain. Tomorrow I will do these edits. If you wanted to mention anything more so please let me know by this talk page

You have to write this issue on Suresh Raina talk page. Before editing make sure you have refs to add. Success think (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

You removed Citation form Kemar Roach
Stop this type of activity, you removed citations from a para |here, It can be considered as act of Vandal ? I want experienced editor, 's take on this. Is this allowed? What WP call this type of work? Is is a vandalism? Or we have to ignore them (R'11). He adds his opinion on Cric articles.Success think (talk) 10:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

This is not my opinion. I have said it 100 times. In article of Kemar roach it is written that he is 5'8 and can bowl 150 with a citation which is not mandatory to mention you can simply write he is a fast bowler Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

If you have ever watch cricket, you easily able to know that bowling 150 is not a big deal .without any experience in this field you are exploiting new users this is last warning for you @Sucess think ⚠⚠ Ripomobo11 (talk) 10:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Ripomobo11 please read WP: civil, WP:NPOV, your saying "150 kmph balling is not a big deal", Its your personal openion. WP is not your personal blog, it's a global project. You can't remove cited info without a proper reason. Your lang is offensive, It's clear that you can't speak and write Eng, your writing in broken Eng. I suggest you to stop removing citations from articles and add your personal openions, you have to discuss of Talk: Kemar Roach before doing any edit, don't do hurry, some editors will respond in day or weeks, you suppose to wait for their response.Success think (talk) 14:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Ripomobo11 - Do not threaten other editors ("this is last warning for you ") on your Talk page. If you believe that an editor has erred in editing an article or exhibited bad behavior, then a Wikipedia-formatted warning can be left on that editor's Talk page. For a serious, ongoing problem, a complaint can be entered at the Administrators' noticeboard. Likewise to, personal criticism ("Your lang is offensive, It's clear that you can't speak and write Eng, your writing in broken Eng.") has no place here.  David notMD (talk) 14:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

, I just said them not remove citations from Kemar Roach then they threatened me by saying, "this your final warning". I am asking you sir, Isn't it offensive lang? Yesterday they also threatened a editor on their talk page. You can check this by their editing history. Not only me but also many other editors previously said that, they're weak in Eng. But they calim they're not.Success think (talk) 14:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

It's common sense a fast bowler bowl 150 ,no match of the cricket there is a bowl which not reach 150 and above. I am leaving Wikipedia, thank u for your support. Ripomobo11 (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

I leave, Block me
I leave Wikipedia, no more an editor here because Wikipedia is a website where all editors think that they are best noone can be better then them, noone knows the language better than them, they always make fun of you, and they knows the sport better than a 14 yr experienced sportsman. Some editors think this website is their own and they have made it .by the way they have written Wikipedia is a website where every one can edit, I don't think so!! Please block me as soon as possible .👋 Ripomobo11 (talk) 05:20, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing following discussion at WP:ANI per WP:CIR. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Catfish  Jim <small style="COLOR:#313F33"> and the soapdish  09:44, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you to block me Ripomobo11 (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I have already leave Wikipedia before you block me Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:00, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I am eagerly waiting for this. Thank u @Catfish Jim and the soapfish ,you help me getting rid of burden that I am handling which is exploitation of old editors on me by saying your language is not good, your Edits are fan based despite of citation of reliable website, they say you add your opinion despite having experienced of 14 yr in this field ,they say you are not maintaining Wikipedia guidelines, they use to revert almost every edit, they think that they have created Wikipedia. I will never forget you @Sucess think, @David not MD, @Storchy,@Bonadea,@Blue square thing etc .One day I make my own website and do same exploitation with u 😊 .necessity is mother of all invention. Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

I am not wanted to be on website where there is no value for experience Ripomobo11 (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


 * It's not something I enjoy doing. Your English is not at a standard where you can collaborate here usefully. And your appeal to personal authority doesn't mean anything.  Catfish  Jim <small style="COLOR:#313F33"> and the soapdish  14:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)