User talk:Rishardacmc

October 2016
Hello, I'm Obi2canibe. I noticed that you made a change to an article, All Ceylon Makkal Congress, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  obi2canibe talk contr 11:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:ACMC members of the supreme council.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:ACMC members of the supreme council.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

All Ceylon Makkal Congress
You need to provide reliable sources in accordance with the verifiability policy to show the current office bearers of the party. Simply saying that you have a court order isn't good enough. If you continue to add/remove content without providing reliable sources you may be blocked. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it is not the place for you internal party feuds.-- obi2canibe talk contr 10:14, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to All Ceylon Makkal Congress. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  obi2canibe talk contr 14:26, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

All Ceylon Makkal Congress
A photo of a piece of paper does not count as a reliable source. The onus is on you to provide reliable sources for your contributions. If you don't other editors may revert your contributions. I have checked the Election Commission website which does not give the name of any of the party's officers, it just says "Legal Court actions have been taken regarding the office of the secretary". Until this changes the disputed content should be kept off the article.-- obi2canibe talk contr 13:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)