User talk:Risharder

rIRC
Hi, I deleted your article because I hope this helps  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  19:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. It had no independent references listed at all. It appears to be just a list of features with no indication of why it merits an encyclopaedia article.
 * It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:  under continuous development... the software is relatively stable... Although a link to the website is OK in an External links section, it is just spammy in the main text. The claimed features appear to have no independent verification
 * The article was created in a single edit without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your software is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.