User talk:Rishav72

Proposed deletion of The Crime Detectives
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Crime Detectives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kasamh Se, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kasamh Se was changed by Rishav72 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-09-11T20:16:06+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:16, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Feces
You can't stick a MfD tag on an article like that. First of all MfD's are not for articles an AfD is used to delete an article. Second, you can't just put a tag on and walk away. If you nominate an article for deletion then you must follow up and create the discussion page, with a valid reason for deletion, and list it in the correct place. Third, attempting to have a valid article like feces deleted is a waste of time. Other people may see it as being an attempt to censor or disrupt Wikipedia. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 04:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

stubbing
Please do not label articles as stub when they are not stubs, as you have now done twice to Blue giant. There are other templates you can add if you feel the article needs to be improved. PamD (talk) 22:18, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:PamD has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chevy  Impala   2009  22:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sonic Smash Bros. Beta


The article Sonic Smash Bros. Beta has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article does not meet the general notability guideline, because it lacks significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, and I am unable to find any sources to verify the facts it presents.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Chzz  ►  23:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sonic Smash Bros. Beta
A tag has been placed on Sonic Smash Bros. Beta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RaseaC (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Rishav72 (talk) 21:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sonic Smash Bros. Beta
A tag has been placed on Sonic Smash Bros. Beta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RaseaC (talk) 23:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Please stop your disruptive behaviour of adding stub to articles such as Tudeley which already have a specialised stub tag. Thanks. PamD (talk) 06:51, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. - SpacemanSpiff Calvin&#8225;Hobbes 22:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * PMDrive1061]] (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)