User talk:RisingDead

The article RisingDead has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RisingDead
A tag has been placed on RisingDead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RisingDead
A tag has been placed on User:RisingDead, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Wuh Wuz  Dat  17:14, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. You have violated one or more of our rules, including rules against adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, using Wikipedia for promotion, and editing inappropriately with a conflict of interest. This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia's policies. Although Wikipedia has a great many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not. See FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. See Conflict of interest for the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals here, you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text below this message box.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames.  Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

See also Appealing a block for more information.


 * Please see WP:Spam for an explanation as to why we don't allow external links to other websites willy-nilly. — Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 23:57, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ...and when you say "you could have said I'm not allowed", that's what every single message right here on this talkpage has said up until now. Have you been reading them as they arrived? ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:26, 17 July 2011 (UTC)


 * "If i wanted i could have made a second account on here, without begging here for an unban." No, you couldn't, as that would be sockpuppetry and block evasion. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:36, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * When you say "I though its normal for web developers to define what they are about on wikipedia. Like yahoo did etc. ", it sounds like you were confusing an encyclopedia with a social media site - do you now appreciate the differences, and understand the criteria for a person to have an article here? Also, I'm disturbed by your comments which appear to suggest that appealing your block was your chosen option and that you think registering alternative accounts to avoid it is a valid alternative - registering new accounts while blocked is considered Socking and is not allowed. Would you care to comment a bit further on that? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Also to clarify something: the Yahoo company did not create the Wikipedia page about Yahoo. People who do not work for Yahoo, and have no association with Yahoo, have.  That's how Wikipedia works.  See this page for more information about why Wikipedia does not normally allow people to work on articles about entities they have a financial interest in.  Does this make sense to you?  Do you understand that articles at Wikipedia are not supposed to be created and edited by their subjects?  -- Jayron  32  04:44, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

I told you that i wasnt aware of the rules at first and that i wont do it again if it will be unblocked. It would have costed you very much to give a member one more chance.

All it would have costed you was to check my account closely and see if i do any more inappropriate things. If so, you would have had a good erason to permanently ban me.

I just wanted to keep the account and not to fill your database with usernames that are never going to be used. Whatever, Screw you. You may stick this account deep into your assholes. I will just make a new username if i will ever need to. Thanks.