User talk:Ritiman Thakur

Speedy deletion nomination of Ritwik Thakur
Hello Ritiman Thakur,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ritwik Thakur for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 10:53, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Ritiman Thakur. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ritwik Thakur, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Sam Sing! 10:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ritwik Thakur, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Sam Sing! 12:40, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ritwik Thakur. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Sam Sing! 13:18, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ritwik Thakur


The article Ritwik Thakur has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. JohnCD (talk) 15:32, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I have declined the speedy-deletion nomination, but references are essential if the article is to be kept. Check out Verifiability, summarised as: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source." References need not be in English, and need not be on-line, though both those are preferable, but they must have been published. The point is that readers of Wikipedia should be able, in principle, to check on what it says.


 * For articles about living persons, that is so important that, as explained above, they will be deleted after seven days if not referenced, though they can be restored when someone is ready to add a reference.


 * The verifiability requirement means that an article should concentrate on facts rather than opinions, or the subject's opinions or emotions. As the subject's son, you know many things about him which cannot be independently verified, but you must keep those out of the article and write only what is verifiable - anything else is "original research" which has no place in an encyclopedia. (You should also check out WP:COI and WP:PSCOI).


 * References are also required to meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:AUTHOR and Notability (summary). Lists of what he has written are not enough here, what is wanted is commentary about him and his work, such as independent reviews. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Ritwik Thakur. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Sam Sing! 11:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ritwik Thakur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ritwik Thakur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ritwik Thakur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Sam Sing! 15:10, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Ritwik Thakur article should not be deleted
The article Ritwik Thakur should not be speedily deleted...He is one of the renowned persons in West Bengal.His contribution to literary world by this time has already reached quite a remembering place for Bengali poetry and people will come to know about him when they try to do so..Although your editing suggestions for this article are highly expected and welcomed.The references for genuineness of this article have been placed without bias and are based on documents.As such,authenticity of this article must not be called in question and should be given a due place in this encyclopedia. Ritiman 15:47, 6 February 2015 (UTC)