User talk:Rito Revolto/Archive1

Welcome
Welcome! Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

India.Arie
The content you've added to India.Arie is great, but just a note that Wikipedia prefers American date formatting (e.g. June 4, 2006) in articles about American subjects. See WP:DATE. Also, if you get an account, you can set your own date preferences. Just a suggestion. Welcome again! --Marysunshine 16:40, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Message
I saw your IP address come up on a string of recent edits and wanted to suggest something about them, so I began what's called a "talk page" for that address. Do you share your computer (or your IP address) with someone else? That could explain the mystery... You can also make a userpage by clicking here and adding what you'd like, or, of course, you can sign up for an account too. Whatever you'd like. Cheers, --Marysunshine 17:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Natalia Vodianova. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Ted 04:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Please Use Edit Summaries
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Zpb52 05:31, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Danica Patrick
Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Danica Patrick. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Drdisque 00:55, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Lindsay Lohan and Aliana Lohan
Thank you for your contributions to these pages. However the data has been removed as they are peripheral and not notable with respect to the subjects themselves. Happy editing! RadioKirk (u|t|c) 22:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Again, the data is peripheral and is not notable to the subjects of the articles themselves. Also, your changes to Lindsay Lohan alter the structure of a featured article as created during the FAC process and could lead to the article losing that status. RadioKirk (u|t|c)  14:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Not Emma Watson's page, her talk page. Also, this link documents the process that led to Lindsay Lohan being a featured article. Simply put, once again, the information is peripheral and not essential to the article's subject&mdash;it's perfectly fine for a fan page but, for an encyclopedia, it's fancruft. RadioKirk (u|t|c)  15:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Don't Remove Tags From NK Wiki Page
You said: "Why is having the Lohan kids DOB irrelevant? I did not go into detail about one sibling on anothers page, I just said when that child was born."


 * I'm sorry, I don't know what you are talking about. I haven't warned you about that nor have I reverted changes of that nature as far as I can see.  Perhaps you are confused.  --Yamla 15:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * ''' Yamla,I am confused. Your name & comment was over my edit to the Lohans page, which is why I sent you a comment.

Please do not remove tags such as without resolving the underlying problem. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Yamla 13:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I caught you doing this again to the article on Nicole Kidman. This is blatant vandalism and if you do it again, you will be blocked. --Yamla 15:16, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

What is wrong with my NK edits? I am trying to made each section seperate so when 1 clicks edit they are able to edit just 1 section & not the whole article. I do preview it & thought it was okay, but it was not. The size of the headings ( which depends on how many equals are placed arounf the words) is what I am trying to figure out. I am not senselessly/ stupidly playng with her page.(2)Sandbox: will looking @ the page's changes thru 'sandbox' instead of 'show preview' help me not having to make so many revisions ?


 * Please put your comments at the bottom of my talk page. Also, please do not bold everything.  I still have no idea what you are talking about regarding Lindsay Lohan.  I have not reverted any of your edits on that page and my comments on your discussion page are unrelated to Lindsay Lohan (and do not mention Lindsay Lohan).  As to your Nicole Kidman edits, as I mentioned you have been removing the  tag from the image on that page.  The image is unverified as it does not accurately identify the copyright holder or provide detailed fair-use rationale.  You have been removing this tag without resolving the copyright issues with the image itself.  As to the sandbox, I'm not sure if it will help you compared to "show preview".  It is meant to be used to try out areas you are unfamiliar with, such as figuring out how to add an image, without actually modifying a real article.  --Yamla 15:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

About the NK unverified image: I checked & you are referencing the NK pic at the top of the page of NK in a red dress. I never deleted any tag or naything from this pic. What I did delete was a link for a NK pic that did not work. This link was further down the NK wiki page. Are you a imdb administrator for your words are very harsh ("blatant vandalism" ; "you will be banned").
 * You quite clearly did remove the unverifiedimage tag. See here and here.  You were warned about this and continued doing it, that's why I added the harsher warning.  Note that the warning was a standard template, not something I wrote.  I don't know why you are asking if I am an imdb administrator as this has nothing whatsoever to do with imdb.  --Yamla 16:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Supermodel
Two things would help. First if you register, it would be easier to be sure that we dialog with the correct person and only one person. Second if you read the history on the article, you will see who and why they removed the photographs. It was not me, but the history will answer your question. Use the talk for the Supermodel page before continuing with multiple changes, please. Doc 15:20, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, I try to remain calm, but I'm about to give up on the Supermodel page as I am getting so frustrated with what become edit wars. If I don't take a break soon on this article, I will become upset. Please, in the future, leave your talk posts at the bottom of the page, not at the top, and don't bold a post. if you sign the post with four (~) tildes, it will leave your user name or ip and time of post. I have no problem with full representation of all nationalities, but the historic covers that made history with the early stars such as Lisa Fonssagrives should be included too. Doc 15:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Your additions to the talk page of Lil Flip246 will be missed when put in the middle of the page. All new subjects should be put at the bottom of the talk page, of at the bottom of an existing section when continuing a discussion. Doc 21:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and moved this for you. Doc 22:07, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use
I see that you added Image:LisaFVogue.jpg to Supermodel. However, you forget to provide the mandatory detailed fair-use rationale justifying its use on that page. Without that rationale, it is a copyright violation to use the image on that page. Remember, the image may only be used to illustrate the publication of the issue in question, not to depict the model in question. --Yamla 16:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Bunion
Your recent edit to Bunion (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:21, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Karen Clark Sheard
You added some information to the Karen Clark Sheard articles about the registers in which she sings. Another editor removed that information because a source wasn't given. Everything in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. If you can locate a reference to cite about the notes she can reach, could you please add that information, including the reference, to the article? See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karen_Clark_Sheard&diff=67645173&oldid=66818350 for the changes to the article. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Keri Russell External links
Yamla says: Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Keri Russell. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 17:32, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

208 says: Yamla, They are not MY private websites. I did not add links. Those links were on the wiki page for the tv show Felicity. All I did was add them 2 the Keri Russell page bc there are related. I also added info about Keri's haircut affecting the show Felicity. Also, I always get messages from you Yamla, are you monitoring my IP address? I'm adding the links & hair info back."

Yamla says: These links are inappropriate for an article on Keri Russell. Please reread WP:EL. No, I am not tracking your edits but I do have several thousand pages on my watchlist. --Yamla 17:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

208 says: Yamla, I just read WP:EL. The links I added ARE relevant. Your/ Yamla's opinion is that the links are inapprpriate for KR. I disagree. I checked the page history & another wiki reader RockyMM said quote   "links r interesting, not neccessarily spam" </FONT></B>. KR is most famous for her Felicity tv show, so definitely links to & about Felicity tv show are appropriate. You also called them spam, but as I stated b4, they are links from the Felicity tv show page; so how are they spam? Wouldn't the links have been labelled spam & deleted from the Felicity tv show page as well if the links are/were in fact the spam u r labelling/calling them? </FONT></B>

The links would be appropriate for Felicity because they deal directly with that t.v. show. Linking them in to a page about an actor who played a character on the show is inappropriate, however. Additionally, if these are the links I am thinking of, they require proprietary browser plugins which also make them inappropriate. --Yamla 16:21, 20 August 2006 (UTC)


 * 208 says: Yamla, Again, you are deeming appropriateness, which I think is very unfair. What about RocyMM who found the links useful.
 * The 3 links are
 * TV.com: Felicity – includes full episode guide
 * FelicityPage.com – fan site
 * NoelCrane.com – site that was referenced several times in the show; it was updated during the show's run as if Noel Crane were a real person


 * You say tv.com is not appropriate? It is reuptable.
 * The felicitypage.com is a very nice site about the show.
 * The noelcrane.com is directly affiliated with the show.


 * No as you said "proprietary browser plugins" (I dont even know what those are) are required. I viewed the pages and I dont have shockwave ( I think that is what a proprietary browser plugins is right?


 * Since we are not going to agree, & I dont want to get into an I edit-you revert-I edit-you revert wiki war, who do we take this to for a decision to be made? Is there a wiki arbitrator?


 * The Noel Crane website requires flash. That makes it inappropriate to link in to any page.  The fansite is inappropriate (see WP:EL where fansites are generally not permitted, though an exemption can be applied).  And the tv.com website has nothing to do with KR.  It is an episode guide about the t.v. show.  Hence, it may be appropriate in an article about Felicity but not about KR.  Someone looking for information on Felicity episodes would presumably go to the Felicity page.  If you still disagree with this, feel free to bring it up on the KR discussion page.  Note which sites you want to add and why you feel they add content about KR rather than just content about Felicity.  Also, you'll have to add rationale for ignoring Wikipedia's prohibition on linking to sites requiring browser plugins if you want to link to the Noel Crane site but maybe now that you've seen it requires the Flash plugin, you'll change your mind on that particular site.  :)  --Yamla 16:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

208 says: Yamla, What are you seeing on noelcrane.com that I am not? I dont have flash ( what is that?) But I am on a cable hi speed internet connection so may b that's why I see the site/ the site loads?


 * If you are seeing content on noelcrane.com (particularly if that content is moving text and the like) then you most certainly do have flash installed. Being on high-speed cable has nothing to do with it.  I believe Microsoft used to bundle Flash with MSIE, though this is most certainly no longer the case.  --Yamla 00:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

For my answer go here--RockyMM 13:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Joe Bryant
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Downwards 02:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not simply dismantle links to non-existent articles because they're "dead" or don't lead anywhere. The link you removed leads to a potentially legitimate article subject which has not as yet been created. With this in mind, your actions are not justified. Appreciate if you could refrain from further doing this. --Downwards 02:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Kobe Bryant
In future, do not revert back to an earlier version of the article, thus erasing the subsequent edits of others, because you feel it's already "perfect". This article does not belong to you and you are obliged to explain an alteration of this magnitude. You failed to do this.--Downwards 02:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Let Me Love You
Your recent edit to Let Me Love You (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Song formatting
Please see Manual of Style (music). Song title go in double quotes, album title go in italics. Wasted Time R 21:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Your edits to The Blair Witch Project
Hi, thanks for the contributions to the article, just one small style point. We don't capitalize every word in section headings, just the first word and any proper nouns. For details, see WP:STYLE. -- Jim Douglas <sup style="color:green;">(talk) <sub style="color:gray;">(contribs)  02:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Headings
Hi there. Thanks for the edit on Bono. Can i just point out that headings are to be in lower case except for the first word and any proper nouns which need to be upper case. Thus "Personal life" or hypothetically just to illustrate the point: "Personal life of Bono". CHeck out WP:MOS. Any questions feel free to ask. And why don't you create and account? You seem to be a good editor. --Merbabu 02:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Ditto on the point above -- your edits to Annie Leibovitz also incorrectly changed the headings to upper case. Would you mind changing them back? SteveHopson 16:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Learn to read a history before you critique
That is all. Jstohler 02:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Lauryn Hill
Please do not add copyrighted replaceable images as you did to the Lauryn Hill article (diff). The first of Wikipedia's fair use criteria requires that for a copyrighted image to be used, there would not be any way to create a free alternative. Because Lauryn Hill is still alive and performing and especially because of the presence of a, the promotional image does not meet the first fair use criteria and should not be used on Wikipedia to illustrate Lauryn Hill. —ShadowHalo 21:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * One of Wikipedia's main policies (see Five pillars) is that it wants to have free content. When someone takes a picture, he or she automatically owns the copyright to it.  Since Wikipedia is a "free encyclopedia", it avoids using copyrighted pictures if it's possible to get a "free" one, meaning that the copyright owner has given up certain rights to it.  Since it doesn't appear that the image can be used, the image indeed should be deleted.  If you look at the image's description page (Image:Laurynhill.gif), you'll see that the image has been tagged for deletion unless someone believes that the image is not replaceable.  If you have any more questions, feel free to leave another message on my talk page.  —ShadowHalo 01:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Promotional images are not automatically free. Images are free if and only if the person who owns the copyright explicitly says that the image can be used, redistributed, and modified.  Unless it can be found that the image's copyright holder said that, the image should not be used on Wikipedia (not the other way around, that images can be used unless the author says not to).  Google Images is not sufficient for using images on Wikipedia; if you upload an image, the page states "Do not upload images found on websites or image search engines, as they will be deleted."  Indeed I do not believe that this image should be used on Wikipedia since the Central Park image is free since the author licensed the image under a free Creative Commons license.  —ShadowHalo 02:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button [[Image:Button sig2.png]] located above the edit window.  This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
 * User:Alison (Noble Birth) uploaded it, as you'll see at the image's page. You're correct: before I tagged the image, the image wasn't tagged (though I'm not understanding your point there).  As you'll see at the free image's page, it is indeed attributed to Lisa Liang.  The copyrighted image was incorrectly tagged with promocomic; I replaced that with promophoto just now.  Thanks for pointing that out.  You'll see that this tag specifies that the image must be "unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it".  Having the copyrighted picture to illustrate how she used to look would only be appropriate if this is discussed in the article (see "Weird Al" Yankovic for an example).  —ShadowHalo 05:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * She is not attributed on the Lauren Hill page since the page contains a thumbnail of the image and a link to the image's Wikipedia page where she is attributed. The copyrighted picture is not relevant to the article unless it discusses her image at that time, and the article doesn't do that.  Repeatable means that "a free image could not be created to replace it".  Since it's used to illustrate who Lauryn Hill is, it is possible to create a free image.  No, I have contacted neither Eric Johnson nor Columbia Records, though it seems you have it backwards.  It is not the case that Wikipedia uses a copyrighted replaceable image until someone complains; rather, Wikipedia does not use the image unless the person specifically states that it can.  In addition, Wikipedia does allow use of its content for commercial use since it is licensed under the GFDL.  Also, do not remove the Replaceable fair use tag.  It should stay there until the image has been reviewed by an administrator.  —ShadowHalo 20:00, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Do not remove the Replaceable fair use tag. An admin will remove it after determining whether or not it should be deleted.  —ShadowHalo 07:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
 * I have already explained to you twice that the tag should not be removed until an admin reviews the image. As you'll see in the Avoidant Vandalism section at Vandalism, "Removing afd, copyvio and other related tags in order to conceal deletion candidates or avert deletion" constitutes vandalism.  —ShadowHalo 11:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

24Feb7: LH disco tables
Well, for one, if you read the edit history you would see that I not only modified the table to match almost every other table of its kind, but I also replaced the template, which has become outdated (replaced by wikitable). I also formatted the section headings to make the article more visually appealing.--NPswimdude500 00:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1st: I dont apprecaite you unneccessary rudeness. I did read the edit history.When you made the change you DID NOT say/explain that you were changing it bc the 1st table type that was there was.has been eliminated by wiki. Check back & you'll see that it only says edit discography with no reason given.
 * 2nd: visually appealing to who? you?written by 208.58.196.156 12:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I do not perceive you to be an experienced Wikipedia editor, so I'll humor you. According to Help:Section, one equals sign is not to be used when creating headings. So no, not visually appealing to me, but rather an official Wikipedia policy. The Manual of Style states that A) "Articles should use the same spelling system and grammatical conventions throughout." and that B) "If there is a strong tie to a specific region/dialect, use that dialect." Since Lauryn Hill is from the US, and the majority of the language in the article is in US English, it only makes sense that any instances of British English be changed to their US English counterpart.


 * I do not appreciate the fact that you reverted my edits. My edits are founded, according to policy and style guidelines. If you revert them again, I will pursue mediation, or arbitration. This is not a threat, it is a cautionary warning.--NPswimdude500 22:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive or hard to read formatting, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Natalie 20:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

How to leave messages
Please do not leaves messages for me on my user page - that's what the user talk page is for. I have moved your message to the appropriate place. To answer your question, if you actually read the warning I gave you, it refers to formatting, not pictures. Formatting is covered in Wikipedia's Manual of Style, which explains how pages should look. Your edits are contrary to the manual of style, particularly your use of level 1 headings (1 equals sign) when level two headings (2 equals signs) are called for. Please stop creating these inappropriate headings immediately, as I see you've been warned several times before. Natalie 21:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * 1st:Change your tone[[Image:Nuvola_apps_important.svg|25px]]! That was rude and unneccessary. 2nd: the message I rec'd was about pictures. Now it says formatting but before it didnt. You and I are both users. If someone from wiki contacts me I'll heed them as they really know. We are all here learning; your strength is 1920s-50s American history not all aspects of wikipedia world.written by 208.58.196.156 21:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC).
 * I fail to see how I have been rude, so excuse me if I am inadvertantly rude to you now. I have not left you any messages about pictures, and a look at the history of this talk page will confirm that. The message I left you have not changed one bit since I left it. I'm sorry if you read a different message and thought it was from me, but that is not my fault. Natalie 21:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yep you are right.When I read it before it read that you had commented about the images but now it says 'snowbot' did. I still dont know that snowbot is talking about becauese I did not mess with the images.Thx.written by 208.58.196.156.

Heading =s
So far I have tried my very best to be patient with you. And I really haven't been rude at all. First you criticized and reverted my edits even after I explained why I changed the article. Furthermore, I provided you with a direct link to a page which explains how many equals signs should be used in section headings. I'm not going to explain it to you. I called you an unexperienced editor, which I still believe to be true. If you were experienced, you would not be so quick to revert my edits, and you would read the links I provide you with before coming to my talk page asking me to explain them to you. Whether you like it or not, everything I have said so far is true.--NPswimdude500 21:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * W28Feb7@14:16pmest. You were rude to me but that isnt the issue. I did read the Manual Style link u provided but it is a very lengthy guide. You were quick to revert my edits, but you call me wrong. I posted on ur talk page bc after reading the Manual Style I still saw no reason y the section headings should not stand out. And no, not all that u've said so far is true.written by 208.58.196.156 19:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC).

FYI, the bit about section headings isn't even in the Manual of Style. It's in the first link I gave you which reads Help:Section. Presumably you did not read that article. I find that curious because I clearly stated: "According to Help:Section, one equals sign is not to be used when creating headings."This makes me wonder whether or not you're actually reading the comments I leave on your talk page. I reverted your edits because they were against policy. My edits were according to policy. There is a very clear difference. It is not just that your edits contradicted Wikipedia policies, but it's also the manner in which the revert was carried out. You reverted my edits purely because you were angry that you perceived my attitude to be one of rudeness. You made a brash and foolish decision in the heat of the moment without using any common sense.--NPswimdude500 21:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Sat3Mar@ 8:45am <FONT FACE="Chiller" SIZE="2" COLOR="green"> I hate how you presume to know why I made the change. If I didnt say it before or make it clear enough, here it is: I was not angry, I reverted bc the edits weren't good. I pointed out your rudeness AFTER we began posting on 1 another's talk pages; which wasAFTER the edit was reverted. I had no way to know whether or not you are/were rude just based off an edit. And again with the rude comments. You dnt know me but are hurling insults. That itself shows who is brash, foolish and lacking common sense.written by 208.58.196.156 13:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC) </FONT>


 * Honestly, I can't be bothered to waste any more time arguing with you. I don't know what you mean by "the edits weren't good" because as I already stated, my edits were according to policy. I stand by my statement that your reversion was a brash and foolish decision because it did nothing to improve the article and wasted more time in reverting it. I didn't say you're foolish, I only said that your decision was foolish (in fact, I'm the fool for wasting this much time arguing over a moot point). I hope that in the future you are more careful before you wantonly edit pages and revert other user's contributions. It does nothing in the way of contributing and only creates more work.--NPswimdude500 05:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)


 * <FONT FACE="Chiller" SIZE="2" COLOR="green">I too stand by my comments. You made a change-fine. you asked/explained the change-fine. You hurl unneccessary insults <b>NOT FINE</B>. I dont wantonly edit pages and AGAIN you are wrong for hurling this accusation. All that I am saying is that for your future comments to others, your explanations and NICE notification os wiki style rules are greatly appreciated, however leave your insults out.written by 208.58.196.156 05:51, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

Brad Pitt
One of your references ended with a "?" instead of ">", (http://www.imdb.com/news/wenn/2006-01-11#celeb4) that's what killed the rest of them. As for "Jr", I wasn't sure and checked and it doesn't look like that's listed as his full name anywhere besides a message board, so it doesn't look like he's a "Jr". BTW, I see you've been editing awhile, you should create an account. Rito Revolto 18:40, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * <FONT FACE="Chiller" SIZE="2" COLOR="green"> Sat3Mar7@ 10:10pm OOOOOOO. They are right next to one another on the keyboard so I hit the wrong button. Thx you so so much for fixing it. I'd would like to be a wiki editor but there is sooo much I dont know. Daily I read 2-4 wiki manual pages to learn, but the process is very very slow. I'm not a comp sci person so I think I'm at that disadvantage as far as knowledge of all the html codes ( especially for wiki music boxes & charts, I dont think I'll ever be a musical editor! ).  But thx very much for your kinds words.written by 208.58.196.156 13:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)......PS: do you know how to create a page archive? I did read and tried to add wernbot and also asked Yamla 4 help but I still am unable to get it correct.  Thx again. </FONT>
 * I think a page archive is just a new page. For example, I'd go to the url box that says http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rito_Revolto, add "/Archive1" to the end (so it reads "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rito_Revolto/Archive1"), and press enter. Then I'd click on the "Post a message to Rito Revolto/Archive1" link that pops up on the new page and paste whatever archived info I wanted in there. The resulting Wiki-page, "User talk:Rito Revolto/Archive1", is what I would add a link to from my talk page or wherever. Of course, there may be some manual robotic way to do all that, but I have no idea. It probably all says it on How to archive a talk page Rito Revolto 04:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)