User talk:Ritterboy38

Your edits to Grand Rapids, Minnesota
Wikipedia has a very specific definition of notability. The relevant one for Michael Ritter is our our notability criteria for musicians. If he meets one or more of those criteria, and you can find reliable sources that describe him that way, it's reasonable to add him to that list (if you do this, make sure to note what the reliable sources are, such as in a comment). If he doesn't meet those criteria, please stop adding him to the list. This applies regardless of whether he's legitimate or famous.

Also, because of your username: if you are Michael Ritter or are connected to him, note our conflict of interest policy. In particular, Wikipedia is not for promotion.

If you'd like to learn more about editing Wikipedia, you can see Help:Introduction. --Vahurzpu (talk) 00:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I see you went back and added Ritter. While part of your edit summary got cut off, the part I can see doesn't look promising. Where the notability guidelines say national they really mean national; all throughout Grand Rapids is not national. Additionally, the "major competitions" criterion #9 is talking about describes things like Eurovision or The Voice, not a city-wide competition.
 * To be straightforward: I think it's pretty clear that Ritter is not notable by Wikipedia's standards, and so shouldn't be on the list. If you keep adding him regardless, as the message below says, you may be blocked. Vahurzpu (talk) 07:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Your recent editing history at Grand Rapids, Minnesota shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Grey joy talk 06:39, 30 November 2020 (UTC)