User talk:Ritterhelmut

Edit-warring on William Binney
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 19:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Under the topic, "election interference," Article from Computerweekly.com authored by a Duncan Cambell was referenced, which alleged that william binney was tageted in a Russian disinformation campaign. This article is far from conclusive, so the phrase, "it was shown that..." is misleading. "it was alleged..." would be a better choice of words. In my opinion it's a smear peice with little substantiating evidence and shouldn't even be cited, but changing, "it was shown that..." to, "it was alleged..." would satisfy me. Ritterhelmut (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

"William Binney appeared on fox news..." Yes, he did appear on fox news. He also appeared on several progressive news shows, such as the Jimmy Dore show. Ritterhelmut (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

Adam Carter, subject of the computer weekly article, authored a lengthy two page response to the article on disobedient media, showing that many of the allegation made in the computer weekly article are false. Ritterhelmut (talk) 20:06, 14 August 2018 (UTC)