User talk:Ritterhude

Abortion
Hi, I've reverted your edits to Abortion as that section is a summary of the daughter article Abortion and mental health – the 'main article' template at the start of the section tells you that. I'd suggest trying to incorporate your edit into Abortion and mental health, although I should say that it's a single, primary study saying nothing new that the secondary reviews already in the daughter article don't already cover. Hope that helps. --RexxS (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Please don't edit war. If your edit has been reverted, the practice here is to start a discussion at the article talk page (see WP:BRD), not force your view on the article by re-inserting the text that was reverted. Using an edit summary in the first place would help other editors to understand the purpose of your original edit. In fact, single primary studies are rarely suitable for inclusion in medical articles, as secondary reviews are preferred; see WP:MOSMED. I've opened discussion on the article talk page, and you may want to contribute there. --RexxS (talk) 20:44, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

reverting
hello, when reverting, as you did here, please be careful to not undo others' helpful edits. thanks. Jesanj (talk) 13:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Blocked as sock of Mbhiii
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your . Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)