User talk:Ritterrock

About Casey Clabough
Hey there and welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your edits to Casey Clabough. I have cleaned them up to conform to our Manual of Style. You might want to read our introduction to editing to make yourself familiar how to correctly use internal links and make edits to Wikipedia. Again, welcome and have a nice day :-)  So # Why  review me! 14:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there, Ritterrock. I noticed that you have tried to change the category on this page. Can you say why it is you think it should be changed? The categories you have proposed do not exist. Also, the journal calls itself a journal, not a magazine, and so I think it should probably be categorized as such. You may be interested in wp:categories for more information. Please let me know if you have any questions! Cmprince (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello again; I just thought I'd let you know that I was able to find a more appropriate category that is shared by other journals, Category:American literary magazines. Let me know if you still find this to be problematic. Cmprince (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Casey Clabough for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey Clabough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Casey Clabough until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cmprince (talk) 04:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)