User talk:Ritzy101

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Ritzy101! Thank you for your contributions. I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 10:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Maleficent
Remember that the producers of the film had chosen to use "faerie", an old use of "fairy", in this film. Please respect that and do not change back. Thanks. ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 14:56, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm Cowlibob. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Rupert Murdoch because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Cowlibob (talk) 10:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Little Secrets, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  KJ  &#171;Click Here&#187; 07:37, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Annie Maynard


A tag has been placed on Annie Maynard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WWGB (talk) 11:05, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Annie Maynard


A tag has been placed on Annie Maynard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://clpr.com.au/pdf/work/UPPER_MIDDLE_BOGAN_MEDIA_KIT.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WWGB (talk) 11:14, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nicole Kidman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 10:18, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kath Day-Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:00, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kath & Kim (Australian TV series) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 06:39, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Glenn Robbins, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cheers, Melbourne3163 (talk) 04:25, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Trude Hancock, you may be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:46, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathan Bazley
Hello Ritzy101,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nathan Bazley for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Euphoria42 (talk) 00:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brett Craig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page List of Kath and Kim episodes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Marriages, romances, and children of Elizabeth Taylor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marriages, romances, and children of Elizabeth Taylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marriages, romances, and children of Elizabeth Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Theosophist (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Kidman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Upper Middle Bogan
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Upper Middle Bogan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Living Dangerously (talk) 05:45, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Internet Movie Database (IMDB) is not a reliable source so it can't be used. Living Dangerously (talk) 07:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Upper Middle Bogan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Living Dangerously (talk) 22:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Melanie Hope Moretti


A tag has been placed on Melanie Hope Moretti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:09, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello, in your edit history, none of your edits have an Edit summary. Please fill one out after every edit. My edit summaries used to be garbage but now they are acceptable. You should do the same. Just a friendly pointer. Thanks, --DangerousJXD (talk) 05:44, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did to To Die For, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:33, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No. 5 the Film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page (UK). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Invitation


Hello, Ritzy101,

The Editing team is asking very experienced editors like you for your help with VisualEditor. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.

You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.

More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.

Unsubscribe from this list •  Sign up for VisualEditor's multilingual newsletter  •   Translate the user guide

Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Catching Milat


The article Catching Milat has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is an unreleased TV miniseries: clearly not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Slashme (talk) 10:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm JJMC89. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Cate Blanchett without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T&middot;E&middot;C) 05:30, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Blanchett filmography
If the main article includes Theatre, it should be renamed "screen and stage" or perhaps simply "performances". Lapadite (talk) 05:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Actually, theatre credits should remain on the BLP for reference, if only because many of them are still not in the prose. Lapadite (talk) 05:38, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

, regarding, 's objection, you should provide an edit summary for each of those major edits. It's also beneficial if such changes are discussed on the talk page first. Lapadite (talk) 05:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cate Blanchett, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T&middot;E&middot;C) 05:39, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 26 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Cate Blanchett filmography page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=659246548 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F659246548%7CCate Blanchett filmography%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)