User talk:River365

Hi River 365, welcome to the Kenja Page. It is a generic page that relates to Kenja and the current media file. the Kenja website has much of what you are talking about on it. Facts such as Mr Mutch making his comments under parlimentary priviledge are fine, but attempting to besmirch him are not. your link to the site on Parlimentary Priviledge will give readers an insight into various possibilities. earlier members have probably a right to comment, whether that is an attack or not is probably dependent on whether you are in the group or not. I have noticed they figure on your website as well. what this is not is a page subscribing to various conspiratorial theories. I have added the comments on witch- hunt to the term cult as it is beneficial.

legalist

Hi Legalist. Regarding Mutch, I am saying that he has been making his "comments" under parliamentary priviledge or after Ken Dyers's passing when not risking any legal action. Interesting he is calling Ken Dyers a coward. Am I besmirching? I am also myself "commenting" on facts. The Kenja website is not my website, but I am finding a lot of valuable information in it. I will verify this information and balance this wikipedia page that is too much looking like a 'comment' page form earlier member(s). The readers have noticed. Now, I guess that calling a witch hunt a conspiracy theory will depend whether you are part of the Cult Awareness Network or not. Earlier members of Kenja are appearing in the media, so it is fair they appear in this page. I will find another title to make you happy. (River365 (talk) 14:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC))

Hi River, yes you are besmirching, but importantly, you are doing it directly on this site, you cant do that. You are gilding the Lilly my friend, and not refercing public comment through respected and responsible organs. it is your spin on the matter. . The finding that Dyers was not retried as he had completed his sentence was made by Magistrate Clisdel, it is in his transcript and you will have to take it up with him. attempting to include all and sundry in the global conspiracy is fair enough if you can get away with it, I see Media Watch are now part of the axis of evil so my inclusion is inevitable. I agree with the earlier members thing, but I think a lot more people have registered complaint, or made commentary through the media, and as it is in the media it falls under the media section. I will make the necessary changes. I am looking for verification of the cult watcher label. One of the administrators has asked for verification of the witchhunt conspiracy, and, even though I helped you put it up, technically they are right. it is just a theory really, that does not have the support of the courts or the media, in fact the Sydney Morning Herald has found the idea wanting. referencing a paid attorney you will have to agree is a little thin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalist (talk • contribs) 02:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC) (Legalist (talk) 02:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC))