User talk:RiverSpring Living

Welcome!
Hello, RiverSpring Living, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:RiverSpring Living, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 2A00:23EE:2150:2D23:CC07:12FF:FEF2:EAD9 (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:RiverSpring Living


A tag has been placed on Draft:RiverSpring Living, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 2A00:23EE:2150:2D23:CC07:12FF:FEF2:EAD9 (talk) 18:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RiverSpring Living (August 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:RiverSpring Living and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:RiverSpring_Living Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:RiverSpring_Living reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


 * We originally created the page with the intent of creating an encyclopedic method of information regarding RiverSpring Living. I disclosed that I am paid to write this as I work for the company, but have rewritten this article to not sound promotional and the draft submission is what I came up with. Would I simply need to review and revise the published sources to get this approved? We do have articles written online about us and I can provide those. RiverSpring Living (talk) 18:46, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

 * First, even assuming that the first account belonged to a different person, you're still violating policy (see WP:MEAT). Second, even if I hadn't blocked you for being a sock puppet, I would have still blocked you for being nothing but a promotion-only account, not to mention that your username violates WP:ORGNAME.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:55, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I understand this first point. We attempted creation of a Wiki article with a different person on a different account - and they got blocked. I am unsure of any actions taken thereafter, we only took corrective action to change the article from a promotional one to an informative encyclopedic one. That led me here, to the use of my personal account. Note that this account is new, and I am new to Wikipedia as a whole, so I am truly learning as I go. Also, to the second point, I requested a name change today (8/1) as I realize that my username violated WP:ORGNAME.
 * Again, the purpose was to create an encyclopedic article on RiverSpring Living - if I could be pointed in the right direction of how to better frame the article, and how to ensure my account doesn't look like a "promotion-only" account, that would be very helpful. RiverSpring Living (talk) 19:23, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)