User talk:Rivmedia

__NOINDEX__

I see, thanks for the run though of where it was wrong. Its good to see a moderator/admin explain the issue rather than blocking thinking everyone understands. Totally understand your points and thanks for that. In that case, is there any way for this profile to be removed completely rather than highlighting the fact its been blocked ? currently this page is indexed in google under the company name, since its now been removed it looks as if we were spamming the page ( which we wasnt intentionally. ) Would be good to have it completely removed instead of having a big BLOCKED sign ?
 * Officially, we can't do anything about that as blocking notices are not supposed to be removed. Unofficially, I can't really see anyone worrying if you blank the page. (It's a user talk page, so it shouldn't be deleted.) People won't usually go into History to see what was there. (Most don't even know that you CAN do that...) I've added a magic word, so the Google search should die out after a few days. Peridon (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The user page should stop being linked soon too, as there is no page the spiders can see. Takes a day or three, until the next spider crawl. The red box bit is part of our history system and won't be seen by spiders. Peridon (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. MER-C 11:26, 8 December 2014 (UTC)