User talk:Rizalninoynapoleon/Article 6

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Erap Plunder Case, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, Erap Plunder Case appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Erap Plunder Case has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Erap Plunder Case and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Erap Plunder Case with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Erap Plunder Case.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Fair use disputed for Image:Treasury25note.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Treasury25note.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:54, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Vpndc.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Vpndc.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Manila Peninsula Mutiny
Don't you even read edit summaries?
 * The Template:Infobox Military Conflict is not appropriate for the article because:
 * A military conflict infobox (sometimes referred to as a warbox) may be used to summarize information about a particular military conflict (a battle, campaign, war, or group of related wars) in a standard manner.
 * It is neither a "a battle, campaign, war, or group of related wars". If you really insist, add this infobox at Bonus Army and you'll be laughed at the people there.
 * Do not add pp-semi-protected because IT IS NOT SEMI-PROTECTED.

Next time, PLEASE read the edit summaries. They're built in for a reason. -- Howard  the   Duck  16:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Appeal to use edit summaries and/or discussion pages
You've continually added Infobox Military Conflict for absolutely no reason. I've said it's inappropriate, you've said nothing. Care to share why it should be there? -- Howard  the   Duck  10:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:ManilaPen Assault.png, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Image:ManilaPen Assault.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:ManilaPen Assault.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:ManilaPen Assault.png and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:ManilaPen Assault.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:ManilaPen Assault.png.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Howard  the   Duck  16:48, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

pp-semi-vandalism
Adding that DOES NOT protect the article. -- Howard  the   Duck  06:26, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:CNNScreenShot.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:CNNScreenShot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AustraliaP50a-5Dollars-(1992)-donated b.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AustraliaP50a-5Dollars-(1992)-donated b.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AustraliaP50a-5Dollars-(1992-)-donated f.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AustraliaP50a-5Dollars-(1992-)-donated f.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Image removal
Hey, there, I just noticed you removed an image from the Penis article; since the image has seen some edit warring, recently, please feel free to join the discussion on its talk page, in an attempt to reach consensus. Thanks! – Luna Santin  (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2008 (UTC)