User talk:Rjako123

Hi, I just sent you an email. Please read. Rjako123 (talk) 14:57, 29 June 2011 (UTC) richard

Hi, I am a Fieldturf employee and I will be deleting the fields that do not match our database. Thank you

Rjako123 (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC) Richard
 * If that is the case, stop. Your edits violate WP:COI. Island Monkey talk the talk 06:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of FieldTurf installations with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 15:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of FieldTurf installations with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Island Monkey talk the talk 15:16, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of FieldTurf installations, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of FieldTurf installations was changed by Rjako123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.935971 on 2011-06-28T15:20:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of FieldTurf installations with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 15:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you harm Wikipedia, as you did at List of FieldTurf installations with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  That Ole Cheesy Dude  ( Talk to the hand! ) 15:31, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 16:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Per your email I've unblocked your account as I'm satisfied the edits were made in good faith. However I must ask you to note the following:
 * If you remove content from a page you should leave an explanation of why you are doing so, either in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. People frequently delete content from Wikipedia articles in order to compromise them and if you don't leave an explanation you are indistinguishable from these people.
 * Several people left you notices on your talk page asking you to change your behaviour, including several that warned you would be blocked if you didn't. If this happens ignoring the messages completely is not a good idea.
 * If one of your edits is reverted don't simply redo the edit. This is called edit warring and is considered disruptive. Discuss the issue with the editor who reverted your edit instead.
 * Hut 8.5 17:22, 29 June 2011 (UTC)