User talk:Rje/Archive6

This is an archived talk page. If you wish to leave me a message, please do so at User talk:Rje. Thankyou.

Archives

 * Archive 1 - October 2004/February 2005
 * Archive 2 - March/April 2005
 * Archive 3 - May/July 2005
 * Archive 4 - August/October 2005
 * Archive 5 - November 2005/June 2006
 * Archive 6 - July 2006/August 2007
 * Archive 7 - August 2007/October 2009
 * Current - October 2009 to present

RfA support thank-you note!

 * If it's too pink, let me know. I understand it's been known to burn out monitors and retinas. :D ~Kylu ( u | t )  01:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Daniel 123's RfA
Come on, will you count my vote? You closed it as I made a final statement (mind you it was the 18th minute when I opposed). But I guess it doesn't matter now anyway. Aaрон Кинни  (t) 23:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I realize you weren't ignoring my vote, just that it was on the last minute and all, I figured, you know, that it wouldn't be counted. Thanks! Aaрон  Кинни  (t) 23:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes, good work on that. You closed it right on the dot. Aaрон  Кинни  (t) 23:34, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for adding to the List of German-language authors
Much appreciated! Universitytruth 12:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Daniel 123's RfA
Hey, thanks for the advice. I definately should have waited to post my RfA... I'm up to something like 330 edits now, but I'm planning on running again once I can reach about 1200 edits. Thank you for not biting my head off, Dan 19:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Millwall F.C.
Hi, I see youv'e removed Hayles from the squad - if you can spare a mo I'd be grateful if you could remove Berry Powell. I've tried to do it, but Dave Livermore goes "all wonkey"! All the best, Lion King 15:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your time, I'd forgotten Livers! Nothing new, they've been flogging players since Dick Turpin told 'em they were worth money! Be Lucky, Lion King 18:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

my RfA
Thanks for your support opinion on my RfA. With a final vote of (62/0/1), my RfA passed, and I am now an Administrator. I will work hard to ensure that the tools entrusted to me will not be abused, and will wield my mop proudly. Happy editing! -- Firsfron of Ronchester 23:31, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Nanny mcphee.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nanny mcphee.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --85.160.14.179 07:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

RE: IP autoblock
When I went to edit a page, it came up with a title saying that you (RJE) blocked my ip address due to a username "DoodyDooDooHeadFace" for inappropriate username. I have never had an account with Wikipedia until about an hour ago. My email address is ncdetroitmi@aol.com I would greatly appreciate it if you could get back to me as soon as possible so that we can resolve this issue. Thanks for your time.

You've got a Thank you card!
  Open your card! Dear Rje, thank you so much for your beautiful words, your kidness and your trust in me. My Request for Adminship is finally over, and the support and appreciation that the community has gifted me will stick in my mind as long as I live. I have no way to properly express how grateful I am to you for all you've done for me, and all I can tell you is, I'll try not to disappoint you nor anyone else with my use of the buttons... and if I mess up, make sure to come here and give me a good yell! :) Seriously, tho, if you ever need my help, either for admin-related stuff or in any other way, you'll always be welcome to message me, and I promise I'll try my very best. Dear Rje, this is the perfect opportunity to finally speak to one another after reading your words for months and months. I am sure that we'll be able to talk often, and trust me, it'd be my pleasure. Both your contributions and, most important your warm way to deal with others made me notice you long, long ago; and being supported by a person I look up to, like you, meant the world to me. I sincerely hope this is but the beginning of a friendship, and such thought fills me with joy. Please take good care, and I hope to talk to you again real soon! :) With a big hug, your friend,  P h a e d r i e l ♥  tell me  

Thank you


JK
SERIOUSLY, I'LL QUIT HARRASSING YOU GUYS IF I AM REMOVED FROM WP:LTA (and preferably the myg0t article is undeleted, but I can live without that if you are unwilling) 205.188.116.68 01:53, 12 August 2006 (UTC) - signed Johnny Knight
 * If you wish to be removed from LTA you should mention it on the talk page of that article and see what other people think, although I doubt too many will agree to it. I will not remove your entry myself until you have stopped creating sockpuppets, I have no reason to believe you are serious. Similarly, if you want the article undeleted go to Deletion review and argue your case. Be warned though, you will find we are not willing to trade with vandals. Rje 02:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Paul Ince
Paul Ince has signed for Swindon Town, and tomorrow morning when it's in the papers, you can shove it up your ass, just because you have not heard of an event does not mean it has not happened, are you a walking grandstand? I have spoken to Paul ince this evening and he told me he has signed for Swindon, and in few hours your look like the fool you are, and maybe not be so quick to edit posts like hitler


 * I do not doubt that you may be correct about him signing for Swindon, the deal has been on the cards for a while. Unfortunately, as our policies clearly state, we are not a primary news source. All information added to articles must be independently verifiable, which this information is not at this stage. If and when news comes out about his future, then it may be added to his article.


 * Also, please refrain from insulting other editors (it gets in the way of rational discussion). Rje 02:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Userfy request
If you'd be so kind, I'd like to request that this article be userfied in my namespace. The author or major contributor is on a temp. wikibreak and wishes to work on it after he returns (K.V.). At that time I will be more than happy to move it to his own user namepace. Something like User:SynergeticMaggot/Hermeticism and other thought systems would be fine. Thanks. SynergeticMaggot 23:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/Hermeticism and other thought systems

RfA
Hi.


 * Requests for adminship/Stlet.Rozinsky - could you close this please?
 * Requests for adminship/Geo.plrd 2 - an anon AOL IP has undone your close. I think it's the same guy as User:Yankees vs. Red Sox. - Richardcavell 02:49, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your kind comments. I will wait for at least three months.--Patchouli 23:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Block
You usernameblocked 12123434 with the summary that it was apparently a random combination of numbers. However, I disagree. It does not seem random. Broken into parts, it's a pattern: 12-12-34-34. --Gray Porpoise 00:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. I understand. Thank you for helping Wikipedia with your administrative powers. --Gray Porpoise 00:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Protection against Re-Creation//Ayenee article.
At 21:50, 29 July 2006, the Ayenee article was cited for deletion and protection against recreation..May i ask why? the reasons cited do not show up on the deletion review page.

User:12123434
Why is User:12123434 blocked? It doesn't really seem like he has a inappropriate username. --75.33.224.219 02:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi. I will repeat my reply to Gray Porpoise: "I would say that one could break down any sequence into such components. Almost every day an account such as User:asdfasdfasdfasdf is created, these too can be similarly broken down. Given the numbers used, it would seem likely the numbers were simply the most conveniently available on the keypad rather than imbued with any significance. Be this as it may, numerical sequences over four or five are almost always blocked as usernames as they are very limited in their ability to fulfil the duel purposes of identification and aiding communication. I hope this helps explain where I am coming from." For the record, I would also block a hypothetical User:12345678. Rje 12:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, this is an interesting incident. I had no idea people actually acted upon this rule. Are you the only one, or are there others? Trying to search the block log for random-like names is, well, difficult. 192.75.48.150 15:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hah, found one. Never mind. 192.75.48.150 17:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: RfA listing
I am not discouraged by the result. In the beggining at least many good points were raised. I will continue to contribute to wikipedia and perhaps in the future (such as when I have over 1000 no-userpage edits) I will request again. kc4 - the Server Monkey Enforcer 21:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: deletion of Aquilupes
Excuse me,

I recently wrote an article about Aquilupes, a race of creatures I created, and it was deleted. I don't mean to be rude, but why exactly was the article deleted? It took me a while to write.

~ Ashira

202.168.40.207
Hi this IP IS Vandalising - Dylan page I've gone to test4 will you please watch. Best wishes Lion King 02:37, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your message. I was just checking a few things when it started to happen and I couldn't remember who to report it to. I remembered that you were an Admin. so I took the chance that you may have been logged on. I'd been working most of the evening and night and was dead on my feet - I've never had to go to a test4 and thought what the hell do I do If they vandalise again! Thanks very much for your time. Best wishes, Lion King 16:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)PS I have a feeling that this user created an account after the test4 User:Kolanowski and vandalised Dylan again & Bob Dylan. Cheers, Lion King 17:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Go raibh maith agat!
Hi there, Rje!

Thank you so much for supporting my RfA! It ended up passing and I'm rather humbled by the support (and a bit surprised that it was snowballed a day early!). Please let me know if I can help you out and I welcome any comments, questions, or advice you wish to share.

Sláinte!  hoopydink Conas tá tú? 23:57, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

My RFA
Thank you, Rje, for voting on my RFA, which passed 95 to 1, as well as leaving those kind words. Now that I have the mop, I hope I can live up to the level-headed never-blocked standard that you like, and be a good administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. —     17:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

About the tables in the list of films by year
Hi Rje, I did a lot of work lately to make each year of the list of films by year as uniform as possible from the first years until 2001. I have added all films of each year that were in awards and top grossing in one comprehensive list (formerly "other films released") called "Films realeased in 19xx", making sure of the film's release year. This list comes always directly under Awards. When I came to the tables in the 1990s, I formated them in a uniform way and I have nothing against them, so long as there is this one comprehensive list without table formating. The reason is that we are crossing entries with other lists, it's a lot of work and it's very hard to enter or copy code in table form. See also discussion in the Lists of films talk page. Now I have reached 2002 where you have done some nice work in creating tables for this "Other films" list. Since it would be very silly to make another list where I add all the films of 2002, would it be ok if I remove the table and put all entries in a comprehensive listing? I would like to make sure my work doesn't cause any data loss, so I could include all your data in the simple list. Please, let me know either in the List of films talk or in my user talk page. Regards, Hoverfish 12:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for answering, Rje. The style of presentation can become as in the years before, but the additional tabled information, does tend to follow the times, the concerns of film production, not only as art, so I find it would be ok if in the last years such things should be mentioned, but they should come in a nice proprotion and priority, which is hard for me to decide how. So I will just make each year's full list of releases and keep the notes in US release dates. Apart from forming the films by year, my concern is to finish the listing until the present and to add backwards in years all other awards. Hoverfish 22:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

List of albums with particularly long titles
Hi there! I noticed you deleted this article with the message "AFD consensus." I can't find the AfD that this had a consensus to delete for, could you let me know which one it was? Thanks. --badlydrawnjeff talk 21:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Your input sought
Pmanderson is up for another RfA, and I had similar experiences to the ones you were talking about on his last RfA. I don't think he's ready, or may not even have the temperament period (as witnessed also by his recent 3RR). Skyemoor 05:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Producers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Producers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

A request for assistance
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 03:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).

Thanks
Thanks for cleaning up the prose on the intro to Portal:Baseball. I copied it wholesale from the main Baseball article, and hadn't had a chance to fix it yet. Much appreciated.--Djrobgordon 18:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:Films Welcome
Thank you for assisting the project for such a long time, here is an official welcome to the project.  Welcome! Hey, welcome to the Films WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films and film characters. If you haven't already, please add User WikiProject Films to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:
 * Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].


 * The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for January has been published.  February's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:


 * Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
 * Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Film Tasks template to see how you can help.
 * Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia.  Check it out!
 * Want to collaborate on articles? The Cinema Collaboration of the Week picks an article every week to work on together.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 21:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Adminship
Why did you close my request for adminship? I want to know.--Jet123 23:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thanks for supporting my recent RfA. I'm glad to say it was successful, and I hope to be a good admin. Shimeru 15:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Help populate novel list?
I'm soliciting assistance in populating the page List of novels by point of view. Would you consider pitching in? Thank you! -- TheEditrix2 15:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Deleting articles
Have you used the proposed deletion template before? It's a quieter method and gets the article deleted in five days if there's no response to keep it. In addition, if you want to continue your mission, check out my link repository for any film articles that don't seem too likely. I'm fairly liberal with these articles, but if you see something that's doubtful, I'll probably be fine supporting its deletion upon salvaging any relevant info. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 17:37, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh, and I have a list of film articles that struck me as disputable, in case you wanna purge these. Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 17:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA
Hi Rje, thanks for your support on my RFA. It ended as a success. Cheers! SGGH 20:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

RFA Thanks
I would like to thank you for your support in my recent RFA. As you may or may not be aware, it passed with approximately 99% support. I ensure you that I will use the tools well, and if I ever disappoint you, I am open to recall. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to leave me a note on my talkpage. Thanks again, ^ demon [omg plz] 20:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
I just wanted to say thank you for uploading the Waitress poster. I have been looking for a good quality one everywhere, and you saved me a bunch of time. Much appreciated! Cheers!  Icseaturtles  ( Knock On My Shell/See Where I Swim ) 05:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

March WP:FILMS Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by Cbrown1023 talk 00:41, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Adminship for Jet123
You remove me from request for adminship. If this request did not pass, how long I will have to wait to request again for to be an administrator or it too late? I want to know. Jet123 03:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

RFA "Please do not modify it"
My request for adminiship says "Please do not modify it". Is this means that I can't request for adminiship again? I want to know. Jet123 My talk page 03:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It means you shouldn't alter the the closed request, but you can go for another one whenever-- $U IT 04:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Darjeeling Limited.jpg
Hey. Just wanted to let you know what the poster you uploaded Image:Darjeeling Limited.jpg is not the real movie poster, but a fan made fake poster. See here: http://www.slashfilm.com/2007/04/04/wes-andersons-the-darjeeling-limited-movie-poster-revealed

Bronks 11:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

April 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The April 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated notice by BrownBot 21:48, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg
Hello, Rje. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Rje/Archive5. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:47, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Doom poster.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Doom poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

MLB Infoboxes
thanks for putting infoboxes on retired baseball players pages, finally someone is doing that, but when you make the infoboxes can you also put the players birth date and age by using: --Yankees10 22:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Yankees10

all right thanks for adding the ages, don't worry about the colors, I can change the colors--Yankees10 15:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)Yankees10

Orphaned non-free image (Image:GarforthTown.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:GarforthTown.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Over the hedge.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Over the hedge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Aeon Flux Movie.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Aeon Flux Movie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:59, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Appleseed.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Appleseed.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:49, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The May 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated notice by BrownBot 22:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Chicken little poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chicken little poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Constantine Poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Constantine Poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Constant gardener.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Constant gardener.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dukes of hazzard movie poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dukes of hazzard movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Get rich or die tryin.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Get rich or die tryin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Interpreterthe.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Interpreterthe.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Inside deep throat poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Inside deep throat poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Jarhead.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jarhead.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Great raid.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Great raid.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hustle and flow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hustle and flow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Manderlay movie poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Manderlay movie poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Hustle and flow.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hustle and flow.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Proof poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Proof poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:History of violence.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:History of violence.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Riverdogs.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Riverdogs.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Slackers.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Slackers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Roll bounce.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Roll bounce.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:37, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Squid and the whale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Squid and the whale.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Southland tales.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Southland tales.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:36, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Rumor has it.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rumor has it.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Skeleton key.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Skeleton key.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Colors
I dont know if you care about this but, Can you go to Reggie Jacksons and Jeff Nelson (baseball player) talk pages and vote for what colors they should have in there infoboxes, thanks--Yankees10 23:13, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Yankees10

June 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The June 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Nehrams2020 08:57, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Steamboy.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Steamboy.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Unleashed poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Unleashed poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Year of the yao.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Year of the yao.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:07, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Lets go to prison.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Lets go to prison.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jackofalltradesmasterofnone 13:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Madagascar_poster.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Madagascar_poster.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 19:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Images without source
OsamaK 12:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Why we fight.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Why we fight.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. After Midnight 0001 03:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007 WP:FILMS Newsletter
The July 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This is an automated delivery by BrownBot 19:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Glory road.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Glory road.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse@ 11:39, 13 August 2007 (UTC)