User talk:Rjohns81/sandbox

Hi, you did a great job on your wiki. It was easy to read and flowed nicely. I think the only thing i didn't see on there was family/medical history in diagnosis, and screening in treatment unless I missed it. You did a good job linking pages that may be difficult for people to understand. Overall I think it was very well written. Kmehta92 (talk) 20:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Khushbu

I really like the depth of information that you were able to compile on the disease! I would take into consideration though that the average person may find it a little dense to get through, especially since most people go to wikipedia for quick information. Can there be any familial susceptibility to this? Bkp31079 (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)Bianca

192.175.17.29 (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I like that you incorporated the basic stuff that was on the page and expanded on it.
 * Nice abstract and good overall explanation.
 * Could use clarification in some areas, especially mechanism, for the lay reader.
 * Well cited.
 * This looks really good! Other than some copy editing, and a little more linking, this is practically ready.