User talk:Rjp2490

Anjana Chaudhuri
Hi Fellow editor, your changes to the above article have been reverted as the links and sources did not meet the Wikipedia WP:Verifiability policy. What I also suggest, is before removing links or other references to raise them on the talk page. Otherwise it may seem you are WP:Edit War ing, which could get you blocked from editing here. Thanks--S H 10:50, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Anjana Chaudhari, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. S H 17:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

You've Done it Again
The reference you have added refers to Anjana/Patel, no reference to Anjana Chaudhri. Also you have deleted valid references. I suggest you look at WP:Verifiability again and also WP:Manual of Style. Also I suggest you tone down the aggresive manner in which you address other editors here, see WP:AGF. Thanks--S H 07:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anjana Chaudhari, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. S H 15:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Anjana Chaudhari, you may be blocked from editing. S H 16:00, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Anjana Chaudhuri
What I suggest is you involve several experienced editors like me and Dianna. Before you make edits discuss them on the talk page of the article and try and convey what it is you are trying to convey. A couple of things you should be aware of are WP:Synthesis as what you are saying appers to be, and WP:Balance. Sometimes we have to include things in artticles we may not agree with. For example on the Jat article, some people view them as Sudra, and the refernces are verifiable. I don't like them, but that is neither here nor there and they are included. Thanks and Happy editing --S H 08:46, 15 April 2011 (UTC)