User talk:Rjstrock

WikiProject Metalworking & rotary and steel-rule dies
Hi, welcome to the metalworking project. I've responded to your question at the project talk page. Feel free to ask for any further clarification, or just be bold and see how it pans out &mdash; Graibeard(talk) 02:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

WP:BLP
We describe false claims about people, living or recently dead, as false. That you do not believe it to be false is of no relevance here; Wikipedia is not based upon what you personally believe, but upon what is published by reliable sources. Reliable sources declare the claims about the Murder of Seth Rich to bbe false, therefore we will describe them as false. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 20:40, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 21:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Murder of Seth Rich. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants  Tell me all about it.  21:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at Murder of Seth Rich
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Block amended
Calling other users "fascists" is not acceptable, sorry. Your block has been extended to one month for this attack, and your talkpage access has been revoked for the duration. If you wish to appeal again, you may use the UTRS process, although I would advise that you read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲 水 14:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * It's pretty clear that this user is WP:NOTHERE and is just here to do battle. They don't belong here at all. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 17:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with BullRangifer. This editor is practically begging for an indef block. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  19:15, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * What strikes me as suspicious is a history of rather ordinary edits in 2006, then only 3 edits in 12 YEARS, followed by the polemic edits recently. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I've seen that exact pattern numerous times with accounts pushing right-wing POV. My best guess is that it's an account that was hijacked and then sold of to the highest bidder. I have no sympathy for them, nor do I feel any particular need to rehabilitate them. Just indef them and be done with it, I say. Search the ANI archives for my signature (and my main username: MjolnirPants, to find cases before I started using the elder futhark runes in my sig) for instances where I supported indeffing an editor for right-wing POV pushing and about 80% of those cases will be an editor with virtually the exact same pattern: edits for a while, then goes dormant, then comes back with a vengeance sometime after late 2016 to push pro-Trump, pro-Russian or just a general right-wing POV. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants   Tell me all about it.  20:12, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Not okay. They can do this in public, right here. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 20:34, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually they can't as their talk page access was revoked. The UTRS appeal was declined.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * And UTRS access was removed for 14 days as well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:47, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Ironic that this entire incident started over me questioning the use of the phrase "false claim" only to have it end with an Admin making a false claim/accusation.