User talk:Rjstrother

July 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Preston Reed has been reverted. Your edit here to Preston Reed was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymgsRU6MbNE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Preston Reed article editing
Hello. Thank you for your interest in the Preston Reed page. The "Press" references you added are considered as primary sources as you have linked to Preston's own website. In order for these references to be acceptable according to Wikipedia policies, you should have links to the actual articles themselves. Please review Citing_sources. Also, these types of information are best fit into article text itself rather than a list. It will probably be removed.

I am trying to beef up Preston's page here also by adding appropriate sources and to remove the tags at the beginning. It does not qualify yet as there is still "No original research" included in the article that does not have references to support it. Airproofing (talk) 19:23, 29 July 2014 (UTC)