User talk:Rjwilmsi/Archives/2012/April

Possible Cite template parameter cleanup bot
Hi Rjwilmsi - some time ago you offered to help with a bot to fix some of the issues I raised on the AWB talk page. I've finally got my thoughts together on this. Here's what I think could be automated to sweep up as much as possible whilst avoiding false positives: There are some other related improvements I'd like to see made, but I think they would be more controversial, so perhaps should be handled separately: How does this look to you? I have no experience with bots, so I wouldn't know where to start, but I do have regexes to cover the main points. Colonies Chris (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * publisher = (list of agencies) --> agency=agency [e.g. Reuters, Associated Press, Agence France-Presse]
 * publisher = (list of common newspapers, magazines and journals) --> work = publication [if original parameter value italicised, italics removed; if linked, linking retained]
 * publisher =  (list of common publishers)  ---> publisher = publisher [i.e. removing incorrect italicisation from publishers such as BBC, ESPN]
 * removing linking from common agencies, publishers and publications
 * removing the publisher parameter from common publications [e.g. in "work=Time | publisher=Time-Life Inc" the 'publisher' adds nothing useful ]. Perhaps there could be a process to remove the 'publisher' parameter whenever the work has a WP article.
 * I'm generally in agreement with the line of attack on the sources. I have a script that already deals with some of the issues mentioned. I'll fine tune it in line with the agreed way forward. -- Ohconfucius  ¡digame! 13:27, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The bot to do this would not be difficult based on the ideas above, the effort would be in creating the appropriate set of lists. I'm not convinced any delinking should be done, nor do I understand why BBC is a publisher. Anyway, please come back to me when you think wider discussion has confirmed consensus for this task and I'll set up some bot logic. Rjwilmsi  07:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * My last two suggestions were just raising the possibility for discussion, not expecting them to be in the proposed bot, so please disregard them for the time being. I don't understand why BBC would not be a publisher (along with CNN, ESPN, CBS etc.) How else should they be categorised within the Cite template? I can provide regex lists of agencies, publishers and publications that I currently use in my AWB sessions. Where do you suggest would be an appropriate forum for further discussion? Colonies Chris (talk) 15:12, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see why BBC wouldn't be work. As far as I'm aware they have journalists/reporters who write stories for the BBC for TV/website and don't republish other news sources' content, so are equivalent to a newspaper. Though perhaps BBC News is most accurate. As for where to discuss I don't know, template talk pages then Wikipedia talk:Citation templates next? Rjwilmsi  12:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know that I've started a discussion on this over at Template talk:Citation. Colonies Chris (talk) 09:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to events in June and July: bot, script, template, and Gadget makers wanted
I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 02:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Immunology
I see you have edited some of the pages within the scope of immunology. Please have a look at the proposal for a WikiProject Immunology WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Immunology and give your opinion (support or oppose). Thank you for your attention.  Kinkreet ~&#9829;moshi moshi&#9829;~ 09:34, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Worst Cooks in America
Just out of curiosity how did this article end up getting a persondata template? Decathlete (talk) 22:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Also The Williams Brothers was given the template. Decathlete (talk) 22:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * add Whitfield Fine Art to the list. Decathlete (talk) 22:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Use of refimproveBLP confused the logic on the first one. Misuse of people infoboxes for the latter two. I'll add an exception to the bot's logic for the first one. Rjwilmsi  00:05, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Rjwilmsi! If I could make a request, would it be possible for you to please expand the documentation at AWB/GF a little bit?  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 00:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Exception to cover Worst Cooks in America. Rjwilmsi  05:38, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. If I find any more I'll let you know. Decathlete (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

BLP others
I have reverted RjwilmsiBot a number of times now, for adding persondata on Nigahiga, a bio, which isn't a person. Should articles with BLP others, on the talk page, be black listed for persondata? 117Avenue (talk) 02:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * It's the birth date and age that caused the confusion. adds an exception to the AWB logic. Thanks  Rjwilmsi  05:46, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 117Avenue (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Foreign Language Grammar
I reverted an edit to Synthetic cannabis. The references are in a foreign language and use their own grammar rules.MartinezMD (talk) 19:45, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Your change contradicts MOS:QUOTE: "Non-English typographical elements in quotations: Replace them with their English-language equivalents" Rjwilmsi  19:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My bad. I read the first section "Preserve the original text, spelling, and punctuation..." and missed the part about the quotation marks. I'll revert if you didn't already. MartinezMD (talk) 00:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

ref=harv
I am going to revert this edit as I think that putting the parameter ref=harv first is better style as it is easier to spot whether it has been applied to all the books to which short citations are linked. I would appreciate it if you would alter you bot's algorithm so that it does not move this parameter about. -- PBS (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The parameters were not moved, duplicates were removed. If you want to change the article then please remove the duplicates from the end of the cites. Rjwilmsi  11:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I had already seen that when I partially reverted the edit :-0 Please rewrite your algorithm so that when that happens you remove the second one rather than the first one. -- PBS (talk) 11:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Page numbers with hypens
You should not change to. See this bot edit. Many texts use chapter-hypen-page numbers. Glrx (talk) 16:03, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I've amended the skip logic so it's not done by the bot task (only with my manual review, where I'd see the wiki comment). I've also changed the article to use a non-breaking hyphen, this means it's not picked up as a possible page range by bots. Thanks Rjwilmsi  16:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I guess I need to start entering nonbreaking hypens. Hypens and dashes, oh my! Glrx (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

2012 archives
Hi Rjwilmsi! You may want to add links to your 2012 archives to the archive box on the right. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 19:00, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Typoscan is working again
Just in case you haven't been following WikiProject TypoScan, Reedy got this working again. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 01:50, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

AWB: Alerts and Pre-parsed mode
Regarding this, did you ever find a way to make AWB alerts interact with pre-parsed mode, or is that going to be an upcoming feature? It would clearly be helpful, and I don't think its usefulness would be confined to just me. Jesse V. (talk) 23:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

age of death
Maybe you are interested in perfoming changes like this one. -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivan Milosevic


The article Ivan Milosevic has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 02:31, 25 April 2012 (UTC)