User talk:RkOrton/Archive 5

Re:Leaving
I never said that..I dont even know what you are talking about..-- 3 L  V a  K 3  r 0  14:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * No, you are a great editor. You just still have to learn some of Wiki's policies, but on the other hand you are a great help around here, especially in the WP:PW community.-- 3 L  V a  K 3  r 0  19:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Now I feel bad. Today, both you and Matt retired, and I am part of the reason why. =( – L A  X  20:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I would rather talk about this via e-mail. Please mail me if you would like to talk. – L A  X  20:47, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yahoo IM. Use the online messenger. – L A  X  20:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. So, do you want to talk via Yahoo! IM? Or.. – L A  X  21:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 'kay. – L A  X  21:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you IM? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yahoo right? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Let's talk, shall we. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * thinkblue_d. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I've also been thinking of this. And wiki is too much interference in my life. Lets Retire in Peace (R.I.P) 3 L   V a  K 3  r 0  23:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * And Zenlax,-- 3 L  V a  K 3  r 0  23:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:38, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Reply
I don'y have a im right now is there any for the web that are free lol?  Cryme  Tyme  -94   01:06, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * O.K so what's your im? O and I might get a 360 this summer maybe we can play together :)  Cryme  Tyme  -94   01:11, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If I get one i will get live!So what's your im? I'm trying to setup one on yahoo.  Cryme  Tyme  -94   01:16, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sweet I made your wiki freinf list..So are you leveing for shure?  Cryme  Tyme  -94   01:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * What link is red? – L A  X  19:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, it doesn't appear red to me. BTW, would you like to talk via IM? – L A  X  19:37, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * You're back!? – L A  X  14:56, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Damn. – L A  X  15:17, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Gone... forever. It was just becoming way too series to exist. – L A  X  22:30, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey I have one more thing to say 'cause I know that some snooty admin will bust me but I saw your new's letter to all kliq members, and me and you lived like thirty minutes apart lol.  Cryme  Tyme  -94   23:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * It's gone for good? Cryme  Tyme  -94   18:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

April GA Newsletter
The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

iAmBack

 * So, what's up with you and the craziness of fixing all the Raw's? --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, well not to say crap or whatever, but I noticed that you ended up replacing "RAW" with "Raw" on the refs. for HBK's article and you do realize that they didn't need to change. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:10, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, don't forget that Raw is also RAW. So, I'll fix it if you want. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:16, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Exactly what Bdve said, you don't need to change the ref. settings. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: I dont Know
First of all, RFCs should be put on the talk page of the article, and they should include more than just the template name. See Template:RFCpolicy list. MessedRocker (talk) 23:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Raw
You don't change direct quotes.«»bd(talk stalk) 02:18, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Poison (band)
Four IP edits in the last three days? Of which only one possibly constituted actual vandalism? Semi-protection is used for heavy and persistent vandalism - this article in no way qualifies at this point in time. GBT/C 14:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Only where that vandalism is so heavy it is causing considerable disruption to the article to fix it all the time. Again, that is not the case here - only one of the edits in the last week is actually clear cut vandalism. Semi-protection would be a completely over-the-top response to such a low level of vandalism. As a comparator, have a look at the history of an article that was semi-protected recently, and the large levels of vandalism it was experiencing. GBT/C 16:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:PW Newsletter
Hello! I see that you have a newsletter interview scheduled for a future edition of the newsletter. Due to the fact that we have started the Editor of the week, we will stop the interviews. The EOTW will be interviewed instead. To be fair, you have one week to answer the questions in your interview, as all of the interviews will go out in next week's newsletter. Cheers! iMat thew   20  08  16:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)