User talk:Rk a2016

Welcome!
Hello, Rk a2016, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jayaram Ramineni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Schwede 66  23:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Jayaram Ramineni


The article Jayaram Ramineni has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Does not demonstrate how this person meets Notability (people), and the one source mentions him in half a sentence only.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Schwede 66  23:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jayaram Ramineni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayaram Ramineni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jayaram Ramineni until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Schwede 66  18:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
There are a couple of things to note about your editing of Jayaram Ramineni.

Because of your stated relationship to Jayaram you will need to use to talk page to suggest changes, rather than edit the article directly yourself - see Conflict of interest for an explanation However, not wishing to discourage you, what you can do to assist the article is to provide references to newspaper or magazine articles that might assist editors in establishing Jayaram's notability. For guidance see WP:Notability (people) and Identifying reliable sources. Unfortunately the cinegoer.net site does not reach the required level. What you should be looking for are major newspapers and/or magazines.

You will see that the articles talk page has now been linked to some relevant projects within Wiki. They may also be a source of usefl information and assistance. NealeFamily (talk) 00:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jayaram Ramineni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jayaram Ramineni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jayaram Ramineni& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RationalPuff (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)