User talk:Rkendrick

Copyright issue with Chime history
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chime history, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.billib.co.uk/content/historyofchimes.asp. As a copyright violation, Chime history appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chime history has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Chime history. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Chime history, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ~Matticus TC 13:18, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Copyright issue with St michael chime
Hello. Concerning your contribution, St michael chime, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.billib.co.uk/content/historyofchimes.asp. As a copyright violation, St michael chime appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. St michael chime has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:St michael chime. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at St michael chime, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. ~Matticus TC 13:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Billib clocks
A tag has been placed on Billib clocks, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)