User talk:Rkieferbaum

Question from LeonaLeeSykes (18:29, 22 April 2024)
Hello Rkieferbaum. I would like to add a coroner's report to a suicide on the deadly incidents section on the Burj Khalifa page. I have the document. Could I use this as a reference or should I use mention of it from a newspaper report. Thank you. --LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 18:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


 * hello there! Citing the document itself, if you have access to it directly, would be problematic. But if it is publicly accessible or if it has been mentioned by an independent and reliable source, then, by all means, you should cite the information that was replicated there. Does that solve your problem? Cheers! Rkieferbaum (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much Rkieferbaum. I will try that. LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Would I be able to reference emails sent from a government body confirming that the information that my daughter died from the observation deck was received from the CID Dubai? LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 16:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
 * hi there. I'm so sorry for not replying you sooner. I didn't realize you had written twice. In any case, I'm sorry for your loss. Do you still need assistance on that topic? You can, in theory, cite correspondence through Template:Cite letter. It can be a little delicate to cite it if you're the only person who has access to it. Would you care to share more about the topic (which article you're editing, etc.)? Rkieferbaum (talk) 20:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for coming back to me Rkieferbaum. The article I'm referring to is on the Burj Khalifa page - deadly incidents and my daughter's suicide. Subsequent to my contacting you I have been communicating with Andy the Grump and I now accept that there's no more I can add to the article as the government of Dubai's denial on the location of Laura's death has been disproved. And how could they retract such a big lie so it will just remain a lie on their part?
 * Thank you and all the best to you.
 * LeonaLeeSykes LeonaLeeSykes (talk) 09:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Global Project Against Hate and Extremism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Project Against Hate and Extremism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Global Project Against Hate and Extremism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Star  Mississippi  20:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Sun Bangla
I agree with your reason that Sun Bangla is stable article with 5 years then why some other people redirected Sun Marathi page which was also stable article with 3 years. The reason which they gave that page is not up to date with notability, then same goes with Sun Bangla page too, so either this page also should redirect or else please help to revert back Sun Marathi page. 152.57.250.109 (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there! See, the example you cited went through an AfD process. The outcome will not necessarily be the same for Sun Bangla, though it could. You could start an AfD for that and cite the Sun Marathi AfD as reference. Rkieferbaum (talk) 17:52, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Problematic changes by Sapsby
Hi. The user Sapsby did the same thing (not only today and yesterday, but also some time ago, several times), i.e. change or alter the place of origin in the infobox, also in the cappuccino page. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2024 (UTC)


 * hi there. I'll try to keep an eye on those articles and make sure we follow the platform standards for that. Cheers! Rkieferbaum (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi Rkieferbaum. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 10:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only . Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
 * Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!